Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

phi 413 Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

Based on the required topic study materials, write a reflection about worldview and respond to following:

  1. In 250-300      words, explain the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and      ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism within      health care.
  2. In 250-300      words, explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments      against it.

Scientism refers to the belief that all things can be scientifically explained. The worldview believes that there is no absolute truth except through scientific investigations (Child, 2017). However, the Christians tend to oppose scientism as they believe in religion and traditions transcended through generations, and this means that people believe in what they found existing without doubting or even inquiring about them. Therefore, the Christian worldview is parallel to the scientism.

The first argument against the scientism is evident through the life and death explanations. According to scientism, death marks the end of life. People who die cease to exist and instead undergo putrefaction. Therefore, the argument that there is life after death contradicts the scientism belief. Life after death argument holds that people who die start another life in the spirit. Also, the destination of a person after death depends on how they lived on earth. The sinners are destined to eternal condemnation while the righteous inherit the kingdom of God, where they enjoy life eternally.

  1. In 750-1,000      words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own      personal perspective and worldview: (a) What is ultimate reality? (b) What      is the nature of the universe? (c) What is a human being? (d) What is      knowledge? (e) What is your basis of ethics? (f) What is the purpose of      your existence?

Remember to support your reflection with the topic study materials. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.

Rubric 

· Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear, detailed, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the subject. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

· Explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear and insightful. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials.

· Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with deep personal insight.

· Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

· Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

· Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER:Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
PHI-413V PHI-413V-O502 Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory 100.0

Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) Satisfactory (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Excellent (100.00%)
Content 90.0%
Christian Perspective of Spirituality and Ethics in Contrast to Postmodern Relativism 30.0% Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is incomplete or insufficient. Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is unclear. Explanation is not supported by topic study materials. Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear. Explanation is not supported by topic study materials. Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear and detailed. Explanation is supported by topic study materials. Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear, detailed, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the subject. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

Scientism and Arguments 30.0% Explanation of scientism or the explanations of two main arguments against scientism are inaccurate. Details are not supported. Description of scientism is accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are unclear. Details are not clearly supported by topic study materials. Explanation of scientism is clear. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear. Details are supported by topic study materials. Explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials. Explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear and insightful. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials.

Personal Perspective and Worldview 30.0% Worldview questions are not fully answered. Each of the worldview questions is answered but is lacking a personal connection or clarity. Each of the worldview questions is answered with personal connection. Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with personal connection. Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with deep personal insight.

Organization, Effectiveness, and Format 10.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory – Rubric

Criteria Description

Christian Perspective of Spirituality and Ethics in Contrast to Postmodern Relativism

5. Excellent

30 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear, detailed, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the subject. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

4. Good

25.5 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear and detailed. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

3. Satisfactory

22.5 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear. Explanation is not supported by topic study materials.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

19.5 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is unclear. Explanation is not supported by topic study materials.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is incomplete or insufficient.

Criteria Description

Scientism and Arguments

5. Excellent

30 points

Explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear and insightful. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials.

4. Good

25.5 points

Explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials.

3. Satisfactory

22.5 points

Explanation of scientism is clear. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear. Details are supported by topic study materials.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

19.5 points

Description of scientism is accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are unclear. Details are not clearly supported by topic study materials.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Explanation of scientism or the explanations of two main arguments against scientism are inaccurate. Details are not supported.

Criteria Description

Personal Perspective and Worldview

5. Excellent

30 points

Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with deep personal insight.

4. Good

25.5 points

Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with personal connection.

3. Satisfactory

22.5 points

Each of the worldview questions is answered with personal connection.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

19.5 points

Each of the worldview questions is answered but is lacking a personal connection or clarity.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Worldview questions are not fully answered.

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

4.25 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory

3.75 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.25 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

4.25 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

3.75 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.25 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.