PSY 201 Assignment Paraphrasing

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

PSY 201 Assignment Paraphrasing

PSY 201 Assignment Paraphrasing

1. Watch the following video on plagiarism and APA citation

2. Read the following course requirement for writing in
psychology courses at Post University:

For all written work in this course, it is expected that you
will write using your OWN words. You are expected to discuss psychological
concepts, theories, and research results. In doing so, you will learn to
communicate using the “language” and terminology of psychology. Although you
will learn the language of psychology, it is critical that you communicate your
learning by using your own words. If you
describe the theory or research results of others, you must paraphrase the main
ideas in your own words (see the first link). Paraphrasing is the only way you
can clearly show your instructor what you have learned. Paraphrasing is
different from summarizing. Visit second link to learn the difference:

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:PSY 201 Assignment Paraphrasing

3. After watching the video, paraphrase the paragraphs below. That is, re-write the passages in your OWN
words. Be sure to cite all information and include a reference. The information
was taken directly from your textbook, so you will cite and reference that
source. Use APA-style.

“The argument about nature versus nurture, also
referred to as heredity versus environment or nativism versus empiricism, is
one of the oldest and most central theoretical issues within both psychology
and philosophy. For example, have you ever heard someone say that “baby talk”
will interfere with a child’s language development? If so, then you have heard
an argument for the nurture side of the debate. Such a statement assumes that
language development is mostly a matter of imitation: The child must hear language
that is properly pronounced and grammatically
in order to develop linguistic fluency. The nature side would counter
that children possess some kind of internal mechanism to ensure that they
develop fluent language, no matter how many “goo-goo-ga-gas” they hear from
those around them. “Which side is right?” students invariably ask. If there
were a simple answer to that question, the debate would have ceased long ago.
Instead, the controversy continues to- day with regard to many developmental
processes, including language development.

Philosophically, the nature side of the controversy was
represented by the idealists and rationalists, principally Plato and Rene?
Descartes, both of whom believed that at least some knowledge is inborn. On the
other side of the argument were a group of British philosophers called
empiricists, including John Locke, who insisted that at birth the mind is a
blank slate— in Latin, a tabula rasa. All knowledge, the empiricists argued, is
created by experience. From this perspective, developmental change is the
result of external, environmental factors acting on a child whose only relevant
internal characteristic is the capacity to respond. In contrast to both
rationalists and empiricists, other philosophers believed that development
involved an interaction between internal and external forces”

This assignment is worth 5% of your grade and is due by
11:59 PM on Sunday of Week 2.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.