NURS 8302 Quality Improvement Models Discussion

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 8302 Quality Improvement Models Discussion

NURS 8302 Quality Improvement Models Discussion

What is the best way to implement quality improvement? What particular strategies and/or models
should be used when developing a plan? Throughout the past 7 weeks, you have explored quality
improvement in healthcare and nursing practice, and you will continue this exploration by analyzing
specific quality improvement models. What models might work best in your nursing practice or
healthcare organization?
Healthcare is complex and varied; therefore, quality improvement cannot be a one-sized fits all
approach. To fit the complex and varied needs of an organization, there are multiple strategies and
methods to implement quality improvement.

Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto
For this Discussion, select one quality improvement model to explore and analyze. Using the selected
model, consider how this model might be implemented in your healthcare organization or nursing
practice. Examine the effectiveness of this model and consider how this model might be applied to
address impacts to adverse events for nursing practice.
To Prepare:
 Review the Learning Resources for this week, and reflect on the different quality improvement
models presented.
 Select one quality improvement model from the following to focus on for this Discussion:
o Root Cause Analysis (RCA)
o A3
o Lean
o Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA)
 Reflect on the quality improvement model you selected, and consider how it might be
implemented in your healthcare organization or nursing practice.
By Day 3 of Week 8
Post a brief explanation of the quality improvement model you selected, including a description of the
components that make up this model. Be specific. Then, explain how this quality improvement model
might be implemented in you healthcare organization or nursing practice in response to an adverse
event requiring quality improvement. Be specific and provide examples.
By Day 6 of Week 8
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two
different days who selected a different quality improvement model than you. Suggest an additional

strategy on how your colleague may implement the quality improvement model they selected in their
healthcare organization or nursing practice.
Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view
and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the "Post to Discussion Question" link and
then select "Create Thread" to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you
cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully
before clicking on Submit!
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:
Week 8 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 of Week 8 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 8

To Participate in this Discussion:
Week 8 Discussion
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_8302_Week8_Discussion_Rubric
 Grid View
 List View

 

Excellent
90–100

Good
80–89

Fair
70–79

Poor
: 0–69

Main Posting:

Response to the

Points Range: 40
(40%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly
responds to the
Discussion

Points Range: 35
(35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most
of the Discussion
question(s).

Points Range: 31
(31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some
of the Discussion
question(s).

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond
to the Discussion
question(s).

Discussion
question is
reflective with
critical analysis
and synthesis
representative of
knowledge
gained from the
course readings
for the module
and current
credible sources.

question(s).
Is reflective with
critical analysis
and synthesis
representative of
knowledge gained
from the course
readings for the
module and
current credible
sources.
No less than 75%
of post has
exceptional depth
and breadth.
Supported by at
least three current
credible sources.

Is somewhat
reflective with
critical analysis
and synthesis
representative of
knowledge gained
from the course
readings for the
module.
50% of the post
has exceptional
depth and breadth.
Supported by at
least three
credible
references.

One to two
criteria are not
addressed or are
superficially
addressed.
Is somewhat
lacking reflection
and critical
analysis and
synthesis.
Somewhat
represents
knowledge gained
from the course
readings for the
module.
Cited with fewer
than two credible
references.

Lacks depth or
superficially
addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection
and critical
analysis and
synthesis.
Does not represent
knowledge gained
from the course
readings for the
module.
Contains only one
or no credible
references.

Main Posting:

Writing

Points Range: 6
(6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly
and concisely.
Contains no
grammatical or
spelling errors.
Adheres to current
APA manual
writing rules and
style.

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely.
May contain one
to two
grammatical or
spelling errors.
Adheres to current
APA manual
writing rules and
style.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Written somewhat
concisely.
May contain more
than two spelling
or grammatical
errors.
Contains some
APA formatting
errors.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Not written
clearly or
concisely.
Contains more
than two spelling
or grammatical
errors.
Does not adhere
to current APA
manual writing
rules and style.

Main Posting:

Timely and full

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 8302 Quality Improvement Models Discussion

participation

Points Range: 9
(9%) – 10 (10%)
Meets
requirements for
timely, full, and
active
participation.

Points Range: 8
(8%) – 8 (8%)
Meets
requirements for
full participation.
Posts main
Discussion by due

Points Range: 7
(7%) – 7 (7%)
Posts main
Discussion by due
date.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 6 (6%)
Does not meet
requirements for
full participation.
Does not post
main Discussion

Posts main
Discussion by due
date.

date. by due date.

First Response:

Post to
colleague's main
post that is
reflective and
justified with
credible sources.

Points Range: 9
(9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits
critical thinking
and application to
practice settings.
Responds to
questions posed
by faculty.
The use of
scholarly sources
to support ideas
demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding of
learning
objectives.

Points Range: 8
(8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has
some depth and
may exhibit
critical thinking or
application to
practice setting.

Points Range: 7
(7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on
topic and may
have some depth.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not
be on topic and
lacks depth.

First Response:
Writing

Points Range: 6
(6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is
professional and
respectful to
colleagues.
Response to
faculty questions
are fully
answered, if
posed.
Provides clear,
concise opinions
and ideas that are
supported by two
or more credible
sources.
Response is
effectively written
in standard, edited
English.

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is
mostly
professional and
respectful to
colleagues.
Response to
faculty questions
are mostly
answered, if
posed.
Provides opinions
and ideas that are
supported by few
credible sources.
Response is
written in
standard, edited
English.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in
the Discussion
may lack effective
professional
communication.
Response to
faculty questions
are somewhat
answered, if
posed.
Few or no
credible sources
are cited.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted
in the Discussion
lack effective
communication.
Response to
faculty questions
are missing.
No credible
sources are cited.

First Response:
Timely and full
participation

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets
requirements for
timely, full, and
active
participation.
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets
requirements for
full participation.
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 3
(3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet
requirements for
full participation.
Does not post by
due date.

Second
Response:
Post to
colleague's main
post that is
reflective and
justified with
credible sources.

Points Range: 9
(9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits
critical thinking
and application to
practice settings.
Responds to
questions posed
by faculty.
The use of
scholarly sources
to support ideas
demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding of
learning
objectives.

Points Range: 8
(8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has
some depth and
may exhibit
critical thinking or
application to
practice setting.

Points Range: 7
(7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on
topic and may
have some depth.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not
be on topic and
lacks depth.

Second
Response:
Writing

Points Range: 6
(6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is
professional and
respectful to
colleagues.
Response to
faculty questions
are fully
answered, if
posed.
Provides clear,
concise opinions
and ideas that are
supported by two
or more credible

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is
mostly
professional and
respectful to
colleagues.
Response to
faculty questions
are mostly
answered, if
posed.
Provides opinions
and ideas that are
supported by few
credible sources.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in
the Discussion
may lack effective
professional
communication.
Response to
faculty questions
are somewhat
answered, if
posed.
Few or no
credible sources
are cited.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted
in the Discussion
lack effective
communication.
Response to
faculty questions
are missing.
No credible
sources are cited.

sources.
Response is
effectively written
in standard, edited
English.

Response is
written in
standard, edited
English.

Second
Response:
Timely and full
participation

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets
requirements for
timely, full, and
active
participation.
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets
requirements for
full participation.
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 3
(3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet
requirements for
full participation.
Does not post by
due date.

Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_8302_Week8_Discussion_Rubric

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.