NURS 8302 Leadership for Change Discussion

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 8302 Leadership for Change Discussion

NURS 8302 Leadership for Change Discussion

What are the characteristics of a transformational leader?
As you have examined this week, a transformational leader is a leader who is able to inspire change and
bring out the best in those around them. However, what characteristics does this leader have? Perhaps
a transformational leader is trustworthy, inspiring, and charismatic? Perhaps this leader leads with
integrity, respect, and empathy? Perhaps this leader is team-focused, encouraging, and positive?

Photo Credit: natali_mis – stock.adobe.com
How would you define a transformational leader, and when might you have experienced this type of
leadership?
For this Discussion, consider the role of transformational leadership for change. Explore the need for
transformational leaders, and describe experiences you may have had with these leaders. Additionally,
analyze how these leaders might enhance quality improvement in healthcare organizations and nursing
practice.
To Prepare:
 Review the Learning Resources for this week, and reflect on potential leadership strategies for
promoting change in healthcare organizations and nursing practice.
 Consider the potential impact of project management for supporting transformational
leadership approaches for promoting change in organizations.
 Reflect on the relationship between transformational change, leadership strategies, and the
need for quality improvement in your healthcare organization or nursing practice.
By Day 3 of Week 10
Post a brief explanation of the relationship between transformational leadership for change and the
need for quality improvement. Share any experiences you may have of transformational leadership in
your healthcare organization or nursing practice. Then, describe how you would recommend the
application of project management approaches to support transformational leadership practices for the
promotion of a quality improvement initiative in your healthcare organization or nursing practice. Be
sure to include any short- and long-term milestones or goals associated with the quality improvement
initiative described. Be specific and provide examples.
By Day 6 of Week 10
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two
different days by expanding upon your colleague’s post or offering an alternative recommendation on
using project management approaches for leading quality improvement efforts in your colleague’s
healthcare organization or nursing practice.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view
and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the "Post to Discussion Question" link and
then select "Create Thread" to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you
cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully
before clicking on Submit!
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:
Week 10 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 of Week 10 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 10

To Participate in this Discussion:
Week 10 Discussion
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_8302_Week10_Discussion_Rubric
 Grid View
 List View

 

Excellent
90–100

Good
80–89

Fair
70–79

Poor
: 0–69

Main Posting:

Response to the
Discussion
question is
reflective with

Points Range: 40
(40%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly
responds to the
Discussion
question(s).
Is reflective with

Points Range: 35
(35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most
of the Discussion
question(s).
Is somewhat
reflective with

Points Range: 31
(31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some
of the Discussion
question(s).
One to two
criteria are not

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond
to the Discussion
question(s).
Lacks depth or
superficially

critical analysis
and synthesis
representative of
knowledge
gained from the
course readings
for the module
and current
credible sources.

critical analysis
and synthesis
representative of
knowledge gained
from the course
readings for the
module and
current credible
sources.
No less than 75%
of post has
exceptional depth
and breadth.
Supported by at
least three current
credible sources.

critical analysis
and synthesis
representative of
knowledge gained
from the course
readings for the
module.
50% of the post
has exceptional
depth and breadth.
Supported by at
least three
credible
references.

addressed or are
superficially
addressed.
Is somewhat
lacking reflection
and critical
analysis and
synthesis.
Somewhat
represents
knowledge gained
from the course
readings for the
module.
Cited with fewer
than two credible
references.

addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection
and critical
analysis and
synthesis.
Does not represent
knowledge gained
from the course
readings for the
module.
Contains only one
or no credible
references.

Main Posting:

Writing

Points Range: 6
(6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly
and concisely.
Contains no
grammatical or
spelling errors.
Adheres to current
APA manual
writing rules and
style.

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely.
May contain one
to two
grammatical or
spelling errors.
Adheres to current
APA manual
writing rules and
style.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Written somewhat
concisely.
May contain more
than two spelling
or grammatical
errors.
Contains some
APA formatting
errors.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Not written
clearly or
concisely.
Contains more
than two spelling
or grammatical
errors.
Does not adhere
to current APA
manual writing
rules and style.

Main Posting:

Timely and full
participation

Points Range: 9
(9%) – 10 (10%)
Meets
requirements for
timely, full, and
active
participation.
Posts main
Discussion by due
date.

Points Range: 8

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 8302 Leadership for Change Discussion

(8%) – 8 (8%)
Meets
requirements for
full participation.
Posts main
Discussion by due
date.

Points Range: 7
(7%) – 7 (7%)
Posts main
Discussion by due
date.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 6 (6%)
Does not meet
requirements for
full participation.
Does not post
main Discussion
by due date.

First Response:

Post to
colleague's main
post that is
reflective and
justified with
credible sources.

Points Range: 9
(9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits
critical thinking
and application to
practice settings.
Responds to
questions posed
by faculty.
The use of
scholarly sources
to support ideas
demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding of
learning
objectives.

Points Range: 8
(8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has
some depth and
may exhibit
critical thinking or
application to
practice setting.

Points Range: 7
(7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on
topic and may
have some depth.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not
be on topic and
lacks depth.

First Response:
Writing

Points Range: 6
(6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is
professional and
respectful to
colleagues.
Response to
faculty questions
are fully
answered, if
posed.
Provides clear,
concise opinions
and ideas that are
supported by two
or more credible
sources.
Response is
effectively written
in standard, edited
English.

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is
mostly
professional and
respectful to
colleagues.
Response to
faculty questions
are mostly
answered, if
posed.
Provides opinions
and ideas that are
supported by few
credible sources.
Response is
written in
standard, edited
English.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in
the Discussion
may lack effective
professional
communication.
Response to
faculty questions
are somewhat
answered, if
posed.
Few or no
credible sources
are cited.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted
in the Discussion
lack effective
communication.
Response to
faculty questions
are missing.
No credible
sources are cited.

First Response:
Timely and full
participation

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets

Points Range: 3
(3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet

requirements for
timely, full, and
active
participation.
Posts by due date.

requirements for
full participation.
Posts by due date.

requirements for
full participation.
Does not post by
due date.

Second
Response:
Post to
colleague's main
post that is
reflective and
justified with
credible sources.

Points Range: 9
(9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits
critical thinking
and application to
practice settings.
Responds to
questions posed
by faculty.
The use of
scholarly sources
to support ideas
demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding of
learning
objectives.

Points Range: 8
(8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has
some depth and
may exhibit
critical thinking or
application to
practice setting.

Points Range: 7
(7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on
topic and may
have some depth.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not
be on topic and
lacks depth.

Second
Response:
Writing

Points Range: 6
(6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is
professional and
respectful to
colleagues.
Response to
faculty questions
are fully
answered, if
posed.
Provides clear,
concise opinions
and ideas that are
supported by two
or more credible
sources.
Response is

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is
mostly
professional and
respectful to
colleagues.
Response to
faculty questions
are mostly
answered, if
posed.
Provides opinions
and ideas that are
supported by few
credible sources.
Response is
written in

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in
the Discussion
may lack effective
professional
communication.
Response to
faculty questions
are somewhat
answered, if
posed.
Few or no
credible sources
are cited.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted
in the Discussion
lack effective
communication.
Response to
faculty questions
are missing.
No credible
sources are cited.

effectively written
in standard, edited
English.

standard, edited
English.

Second
Response:
Timely and full
participation

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets
requirements for
timely, full, and
active
participation.
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets
requirements for
full participation.
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 3
(3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet
requirements for
full participation.
Does not post by
due date.

Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_8302_Week10_Discussion_Rubric

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.