NURS 8302 Assignment Tools For Measuring Quality In our lives

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 8302 Assignment Tools For Measuring Quality In our lives

NURS 8302 Assignment Tools For Measuring Quality In our lives

How do we determine quality? Quality in other areas of our lives can be subjective, so
how do we ensure—specifically as it relates to our nursing practice—that quality is
clearly defined and measurable?
Tools for measuring quality are used to assess the value measured, collected, or
compared. These tools allow for subjectivity to be replaced with objectivity through data,
formula, ranking, and analysis.

Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

For this Assignment, you will explore at least three rate-based measures of quality. You will
deconstruct each measure to explore your understanding of the measure, its importance, and its
impact on patient safety, cost of healthcare, and overall quality of healthcare.
To Prepare:
 Review the Learning Resources, for this week, and reflect on tools for measuring quality
in nursing practice.
 Select three rate-based measurements of quality that you would like to focus on for this
Assignment.
o Note: These measurements must relate to some aspect of clinical or service
quality that directly relates to patient care or the patient’s experience of care. For
the purposes of this Assignment, an analysis of staffing levels is not permitted.
o You can find useful information on quality indicators that are of interest to you on
these websites and resources. You may choose only one of the three measures to
be some form of patient satisfaction measure.

 Consider how the three rate-based measures (you will select) are defined, how the rates
were determined or calculated, how the measures were collected, and how these measures
are communicated to both internal and external stakeholders.
 Reflect on how the three rate-based measures (you will select) may relate to
organizational goals for improved performance.
 Reflect on the three rate-based measures (you will select), and consider the importance of
these measures on patient safety, cost of healthcare, and overall quality of healthcare.
The Assignment: (8–10 pages)
 Describe the three rate-based measures of quality you selected, and explain why.

 Deconstruct each rate-based measure to include the following:
o Describe the definition of the measure.
o Explain the numerical description of how the measure is constructed (the
numerator/denominator measure counts, the formula used to construct the rate,
etc.).
o Explain how the data for this measure are collected.
o Describe how the measurement is compared externally to other like settings, and
differentiate between the actual rate and a percentile ranking. Be specific.
o Explain whether the measure is risk adjusted or not. If so, explain briefly how this
is accomplished.
o Describe how goals might be set for each measure in an aggressive organization,
which is seeking to excel in the marketplace. Be specific and provide examples.
 Describe the importance of each rate-based measure to a chosen clinical organization and
setting.
o Using the websites and resources, you can choose a hospital, a nursing home, a
home health agency, a dialysis center, a health plan, an outpatient clinic, or
private office; a total population of patient types is also acceptable, but please be
specific as to the setting. That is, if you are interested in patients with chronic
illness across the continuum of care, you might home in a particular health plan, a
multispecialty practice setting or a healthcare organization with both inpatient and
outpatient/clinic settings.
o Note: Faculty appointments and academic settings are not permitted for this
exercise. For all other settings, consult the Instructor for guidance. You do not
need actual data from a given organization to complete this Assignment.
 Explain how each rate-based measure (you selected) relates to patient safety, to the cost
of poor quality, and to the overall cost of healthcare delivery. Be specific and provide
examples.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page,
introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing
Center provides an example of those required elements (available
at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All
papers submitted must use this formatting.
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 4.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
 Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn2+last name+first
initial.(extension)” as the name.
 Click the Week 4 Assignment 2 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the
Assignment.

 Click the Week 4 Assignment 2 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading
criteria from this area.
 Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the
document you saved as “WK4Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” and
click Open.
 If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit
my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
 Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:
Week 4 Assignment 2 Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 4 Assignment 2 draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 4

To participate in this Assignment:
Week 4 Assignment 2
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_8302_Week4_Assignment2_Rubric

 Grid View
 List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor

Describe the
three rate-based
measures of
quality you
selected, and
explain why.

Points Range: 18
(18%) – 20 (20%)
The response
accurately and
clearly describes
in detail three
rate-based
measures of
quality.
The response
provides accurate
and specific
details that fully
support the
selection of the
three rate-based
measures
described.

Points Range: 16
(16%) – 17 (17%)
The response
accurately
describes three
rate-based
measures of
quality.
The response
provides accurate
details that
support the
selection of the
three rate-based
measures
described.

Points Range: 14
(14%) – 15 (15%)
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely describes
three rate-based
measures of
quality.
OR
The response
describes less than
three rate-based
measures of
quality.
The response
provides
inaccurate or
vague details that
may support the
selection of the
rate-based
measures
described.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 13 (13%)
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely describes
three rate-based
measures of
quality, or it is
missing.
The response
provides
inaccurate and
vague details that
do not support the
selection of the
rate-based
measures
described, or it is
missing.

Deconstruct each
rate-based
measure to
include the
definition of each
measure,
explanation of
the numerical
description of
how the measure
is constructed,
explanation of
how the data is
collected,
description of
how the measure

Points Range: 23
(23%) – 25 (25%)
The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail each of the
three rate-based
measures.
The response
accurately and
clearly explains
all elements of
each measure,
including: the
definition of the

Points Range: 20
(20%) – 22 (22%)
The response
accurately
explains each of
the three rate-
based measures.
The response
accurately
explains the
elements of each
measure,
including: the
definition of the
measure,

Points Range: 18
(18%) – 19 (19%)
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
each of the three
rate-based
measures.
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
the elements of
each measure.
The response

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 17 (17%)
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
each of the three
rate-based
measures, or it is
missing.
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
the elements of
each measure, or
it is missing.

is compared
externally,
explanation of
whether or not
the measure is
risk adjusted,
and a description
of the how goals
might be set for
each measure. Be
specific, and
provide
examples.

measure,
explanation of the
numerical
description,
explanation of
how the data is
collected,
description of how
the measure is
compared,
explanation of
risk, and
description of
goals.
The response
includes relevant,
specific, and
appropriate
examples that
fully support the
explanations
provided for each
of the three rate-
based measures
described.

explanation of the
numerical
description,
explanation of
how the data is
collected,
description of how
the measure is
compared,
explanation of
risk, and
description of
goals.
The response
includes relevant,
specific, and
accurate examples
that support the
explanations
provided for each
of the three rate-
based measures
described.

includes
inaccurate and
irrelevant
examples that may
support the
explanations
provided for each
of the three rate-
based measures
described.

The response
includes
inaccurate and
vague examples
that do not
support the
explanations
provided for each
of the three rate-
based measures
described, or it is
missing.

Describe the
importance of
each measure to
a chosen clinical
organization and
setting.

In our livesClick here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 8302 Assignment Tools For Measuring Quality 

Be
specific as to the
setting.

Points Range: 18
(18%) – 20 (20%)
The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail the
importance of
each measure to a
chosen clinical
organization and
setting.
The response
provides accurate
and specific
details that fully
support the
selection of the
three rate-based
measures and the

Points Range: 16
(16%) – 17 (17%)
The response
accurately
explains the
importance of
each measure to a
chosen clinical
organization and
setting.
The response
provides accurate
details that
support the
selection of the
three rate-based
measures and the
clinical
organization or

Points Range: 14
(14%) – 15 (15%)
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
the importance of
each measure to a
chosen clinical
organization and
setting.
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely provides
details that may
support the
selection of the
three rate-based
measures and the
clinical

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 13 (13%)
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains
the importance of
each measure to a
chosen clinical
organization and
setting, or it is
missing.
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely provides
details that do not
support the
selection of the
three rate-based
measures and the

clinical
organization or
setting described.

setting described. organization or
setting described.
clinical
organization or
setting described,
or it is missing.

Explain how each
rate-based
measure you
selected relates to
patient safety, to
the cost of poor
quality, and to
the overall cost of
healthcare
delivery. Be
specific, and
provide
examples.

Points Range: 18
(18%) – 20 (20%)
The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail how each
rate-based
measure relates to
patient safety, cost
of poor quality,
and overall cost of
healthcare
delivery.
The response
includes relevant,
specific, and
appropriate
examples that
fully support the
explanations
provided for each
of the rate-based
measures
described.

Points Range: 16
(16%) – 17 (17%)
The response
accurately
explains how each
measure relates to
patient safety, cost
of poor quality,
and overall cost of
healthcare
delivery.
The response
includes relevant,
specific, and
accurate examples
that support the
explanations
provided for each
of the rate-based
measures
described.

Points Range: 14
(14%) – 15 (15%)
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
how each measure
relates to patient
safety, cost of
poor quality, and
overall cost of
healthcare
delivery.
The response
includes
inaccurate and
irrelevant
examples that may
support the
explanations
provided for each
of the rate-based
measures
described.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 13 (13%)
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains
how each measure
relates to patient
safety, cost of
poor quality, and
overall cost of
healthcare
delivery, or it is
missing.
The response
includes
inaccurate and
vague examples
that do not
support the
explanations
provided for each
of the rate-based
measures
described, or it is
missing.

Written
Expression and
Formatting –
Paragraph
Development and
Organization:
Paragraphs make
clear points that
support well-
developed ideas,
flow logically,
and demonstrate
continuity of
ideas. Sentences
are carefully
focused—neither

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow,
continuity, and
clarity.
A clear and
comprehensive
purpose statement,
introduction, and
conclusion is
provided which
delineates all

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow,
continuity, and
clarity 80% of the
time. Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of the
assignment is
stated, yet is brief
and not
descriptive.

Points Range: 3.5
(3.5%) – 3.5
(3.5%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow,
continuity, and
clarity 60%–79%
of the time.
Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of the
assignment is
vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow,
continuity, and
clarity < 60% of
the time.
No purpose
statement,
introduction, or
conclusion was
provided.

long and
rambling nor
short and lacking
substance. A
clear and
comprehensive
purpose
statement and
introduction is
provided which
delineates all
required criteria.

required criteria.

Written
Expression and
Formatting –
English writing
standards:
Correct
grammar,
mechanics, and
proper
punctuation

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation with
no errors.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1
or 2) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.

Points Range: 3.5
(3.5%) – 3.5
(3.5%)
Contains several
(3 or 4) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥
5) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation errors
that interfere with
the reader’s
understanding.

Written
Expression and
Formatting – The
paper follows
correct APA
format for title
page, headings,
font, spacing,
margins,
indentations,
page numbers,
parenthetical/in-
text citations, and
reference list.

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA
format with no
errors.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1
or 2) APA format
errors.

Points Range: 3.5
(3.5%) – 3.5
(3.5%)
Contains several
(3 or 4) APA
format errors.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥
5) APA format
errors.

Total Points: 100

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.