NURS 8302 Assignment DNP Project Faculty Advisor

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 8302 Assignment DNP Project Faculty 

NURS 8302 Assignment DNP Project Faculty Advisor

Preparation for project planning will begin during the clinical component of NURS 8302.
By Day 7 of Week 6, you will identify an organization that you will approach to discuss
a gap in practice or practice change that you might assist with as your DNP project.
Possible appointments to explore a site for the project include those made with the chief
nursing officer, director of quality improvement, or director of education. In a clinic or
community agency, the contact person may be the director or someone in human
resources. You may complete the project at your place of employment, as long as you are
not working on your own unit or with people that you supervise.

Photo Credit: fizkes – stock.adobe.com

This project will include a development of a staff education program, development of a clinical
practice guideline, or an evaluation of an existing quality improvement process. The project
process cannot include patients or nursing students. The project cannot be completed at an
academic setting.
Preparation for project planning will begin during the clinical component of NURS 8302. The
DNP Project must follow guidelines set forth in one of the DNP Project manuals:
 Clinical Practice Guidelines Manual
 Staff Education Manual
 Quality Improvement Evaluation Manual
NOTE: All forms and manuals are found on the DNP Capstone Resources site:
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/research-center/program-documents/dnp
Your project team will consist of a preceptor or project mentor from the organization, and a
three-member Faculty Committee from Walden who will be assigned upon completion of this
course. You will begin your project in the next term through the mentoring course, NURS 8702.
Once you identify a site and have contacted the organization, you will complete the DNP
Project Faculty Advisor and Site Identification—Matching Request Form identifying the
site and describing the possible practice change or gap to be addressed. This form must be
completed and turned in by Day 7 of Week 6.
Approaching the organization:
1. Identify the organization where you would like to make an appointment with organization
leadership to discuss your DNP project. This can be within your workplace or at a
different site. The site for the project does not need to be the same site as the clinical
practicum site.

2. Find out from the organization if there is a key person who oversees students doing DNP
projects. This might be the director of nursing, the director of staff development, or the
person in charge of quality improvement initiatives. In a clinic or community
organization, this might be the medical director or a non-medical person in a leadership
or administrative role. If there is no key person, your first contact should be someone
from nursing leadership. If you are unsure of how to proceed, discuss with your NURS
8302 Faculty.
3. Make an appointment with the identified person (above) to discuss the Walden University
DNP project.
 Briefly explain the focus of the DNP project.
o As a requirement of Walden University’s DNP degree, you are required to
complete a DNP Project.
o This project will focus on a quality improvement initiative that integrates project
management tools and techniques, as well as addresses a gap in nursing practice
or an identified practice change.
o For the purpose of this project, a quality improvement initiative is defined as an
intervention that supports an improvement in healthcare outcomes. This project
will follow one of the DNP project manuals for the project and can focus on a
staff education program, development of a clinical practice guideline, or an
evaluation of an existing quality improvement process. The project process cannot
include patients or nursing students.
o The project process requires a mentor from the organization that will work with
the Walden Faculty Advisor to oversee the project process.

 Explore a possible gap in practice or practice change that the organization is seeking to
address through an education program, clinical practice guideline, or evaluation of
change completed by the organization to improve outcomes.
 Discuss identification of a project mentor for the project.
 Share the next steps in the process.
o You will be assigned a Faculty Advisor when the next term begins (date).
You will contact organization representative during the first week of the term to set up a meeting
with the Faculty Advisor, the organization representative, and the project mentor to discuss the
project.
Next Week

To go to the next week:
Week 6
Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_8302_Week6_Discussion_Rubric
 Grid View
 List View

 

Excellent
90–100

Good
80–89

Fair
70–79

Poor
: 0–69

Main Posting:

Response to the
Discussion
question is
reflective with
critical analysis
and synthesis
representative of
knowledge
gained from the
course readings
for the module
and current
credible sources.

Points Range: 40
(40%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly
responds to the
Discussion
question(s).
Is reflective with
critical analysis
and synthesis
representative of
knowledge gained
from the course
readings for the
module and
current credible
sources.
No less than 75%
of post has
exceptional depth
and breadth.
Supported by at
least three current
credible sources.

Points Range: 35
(35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most
of the Discussion
question(s).
Is somewhat
reflective with
critical analysis
and synthesis
representative of
knowledge gained
from the course
readings for the
module.
50% of the post
has exceptional
depth and breadth.
Supported by at
least three
credible
references.

Points Range: 31
(31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some
of the Discussion
question(s).
One to two
criteria are not
addressed or are
superficially
addressed.
Is somewhat
lacking reflection
and critical
analysis and
synthesis.
Somewhat
represents
knowledge gained
from the course
readings for the
module.
Cited with fewer
than two credible
references.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond
to the Discussion
question(s).
Lacks depth or
superficially
addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection
and critical
analysis and
synthesis.
Does not represent
knowledge gained
from the course
readings for the
module.
Contains only one
or no credible
references.

Main Posting:

Writing

Points Range: 6
(6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly
and concisely.

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely.
May contain one

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Written somewhat
concisely.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Not written
clearly or
concisely.

Contains no
grammatical or
spelling errors.
Adheres to current
APA manual
writing rules and
style.

to two
grammatical or
spelling errors.
Adheres to current
APA manual
writing rules and
style.

May contain more
than two spelling

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 8302 Assignment DNP Project Faculty Advisor

or grammatical
errors.
Contains some
APA formatting
errors.

Contains more
than two spelling
or grammatical
errors.
Does not adhere
to current APA
manual writing
rules and style.

Main Posting:

Timely and full
participation

Points Range: 9
(9%) – 10 (10%)
Meets
requirements for
timely, full, and
active
participation.
Posts main
Discussion by due
date.

Points Range: 8
(8%) – 8 (8%)
Meets
requirements for
full participation.
Posts main
Discussion by due
date.

Points Range: 7
(7%) – 7 (7%)
Posts main
Discussion by due
date.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 6 (6%)
Does not meet
requirements for
full participation.
Does not post
main Discussion
by due date.

First Response:

Post to
colleague's main
post that is
reflective and
justified with
credible sources.

Points Range: 9
(9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits
critical thinking
and application to
practice settings.
Responds to
questions posed
by faculty.
The use of
scholarly sources
to support ideas
demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding of
learning
objectives.

Points Range: 8
(8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has
some depth and
may exhibit
critical thinking or
application to
practice setting.

Points Range: 7
(7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on
topic and may
have some depth.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not
be on topic and
lacks depth.

First Response:
Writing

Points Range: 6
(6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is
professional and
respectful to
colleagues.

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is
mostly
professional and
respectful to

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in
the Discussion
may lack effective
professional

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted
in the Discussion
lack effective
communication.

Response to
faculty questions
are fully
answered, if
posed.
Provides clear,
concise opinions
and ideas that are
supported by two
or more credible
sources.
Response is
effectively written
in standard, edited
English.

colleagues.
Response to
faculty questions
are mostly
answered, if
posed.
Provides opinions
and ideas that are
supported by few
credible sources.
Response is
written in
standard, edited
English.

communication.
Response to
faculty questions
are somewhat
answered, if
posed.
Few or no
credible sources
are cited.

Response to
faculty questions
are missing.
No credible
sources are cited.

First Response:
Timely and full
participation

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets
requirements for
timely, full, and
active
participation.
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets
requirements for
full participation.
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 3
(3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet
requirements for
full participation.
Does not post by
due date.

Second
Response:
Post to
colleague's main
post that is
reflective and
justified with
credible sources.

Points Range: 9
(9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits
critical thinking
and application to
practice settings.
Responds to
questions posed
by faculty.
The use of
scholarly sources
to support ideas
demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding of
learning
objectives.

Points Range: 8
(8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has
some depth and
may exhibit
critical thinking or
application to
practice setting.

Points Range: 7
(7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on
topic and may
have some depth.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not
be on topic and
lacks depth.

Second
Response:
Writing

Points Range: 6
(6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is
professional and
respectful to
colleagues.
Response to
faculty questions
are fully
answered, if
posed.
Provides clear,
concise opinions
and ideas that are
supported by two
or more credible
sources.
Response is
effectively written
in standard, edited
English.

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is
mostly
professional and
respectful to
colleagues.
Response to
faculty questions
are mostly
answered, if
posed.
Provides opinions
and ideas that are
supported by few
credible sources.
Response is
written in
standard, edited
English.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in
the Discussion
may lack effective
professional
communication.
Response to
faculty questions
are somewhat
answered, if
posed.
Few or no
credible sources
are cited.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted
in the Discussion
lack effective
communication.
Response to
faculty questions
are missing.
No credible
sources are cited.

Second
Response:
Timely and full
participation

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets
requirements for
timely, full, and
active
participation.
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets
requirements for
full participation.
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 3
(3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet
requirements for
full participation.
Does not post by
due date.

Total Points: 100

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.