NURS 8210 Week 6 Discussion Question

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 8210 Week 6 Discussion Question

NURS 8210 Week 6 Discussion Question

Post your responses to the Discussion based on the course requirements.
Your Discussion postings should be written in standard edited English and follow APA guidelines as
closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. Be sure to support your work with
specific citations from this week's Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources as
appropriate. Initial postings must be 250–350 words (not including references).
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:
Week 6 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

To participate in this Discussion:
Week 6 Discussion

Discussion – Week 6
HIT Usability and Design Challenges
Reflect on your experiences with the integration of new technology. How have these implementations
affected the procedures that you perform at work? As the end user, it can be easy to overlook all of the
important decisions that went into the finished product that you see before you. In looking at the final
data management screens, you may find yourself at the crossroads of two options. You may either 1) be
ecstatic about the needed change that this system brought, or 2) frustrated because you feel the system
brings new hurdles into your already busy day. If you have ever experienced the latter option, the
comment “I could have implemented a better system than this” may resonate strongly with you. Though
research agrees that user input assists HIT designers, the development and implementation of new
systems is not as straightforward as it may appear. HIT development teams find themselves in constant
phases of trial and error as they strive to meet the needs of all users within the proposed development
timeline. Failure to achieve promised usability benefits can lead to increased costs and job
complications. Applying effective strategies to overcome usability challenges is essential.
In this week’s Discussion, you move from the standpoint of the “ outsider looking in” (end user) and
place yourself into a real-world implementation example. To complete this Discussion, you evaluate a

case study to determine where the implementation process took a wrong turn. Use this week’s Learning
Resources to propose changes that could have put this operation on the road to success.
To prepare:
 Review the Learning Resources, focusing on the TIGER Usability and Clinical Application Design
Collaborative.
 Consider the “Best Practice Exemplars” provided in the course text Nursing Informatics: Where
Technology and Caring Meet.
 Review “Case Study 1: A Usability and Clinical Application Design Challenge” presented on page
238 of the course text Nursing Informatics: Where Technology and Caring Meet.
 Determine the causes of the noted usability challenges (i.e., human factors, ergonomics, human-
computer interaction), as well as potential usability concerns experienced by staff during
implementation. Consider the possible design failures that lead to the usability challenges.
 What strategies might you employ to overcome these HIT usability challenges and concerns?
By Day 3 post a cohesive response to the following:
 Place yourself in the role of the clinical administrator tasked with implementing the case study’s
new health information technology system.
o Evaluate the usability challenges that you faced during implementation as well as the
factors that caused these challenges.
o Determine whether these challenges were a result of implementation or design.
o Formulate strategies for overcoming these usability challenges.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings.
By Day 6 respond to at least two of your colleagues in one or more of the following ways:
 Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence, or
research.

 Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to
provide new perspectives.
 Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your
own research in the Walden Library.
 Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
 Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing
multiple postings.
 Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives
based on readings and evidence.
Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you
learned and/or any insights you gained as a result of the comments made by your colleagues.
Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and any
additional sources.
Click on the Reply button below to post your response.
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_8210_Week6_Discussion_Rubric
 Grid View
 List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 8210 Week 6 Discussion Question

RESPONSIVEN
ESS TO
DISCUSSION
QUESTION
Discussion post
minimum
requirements:
*The original
posting must be

Points Range: 8
(26.67%) – 8
(26.67%)
Discussion
postings and
responses exceed
the requirements
of the Discussion
instructions.
They: Respond to
the question being

Points Range: 7
(23.33%) – 7
(23.33%)
Discussion
postings and
responses meet
the requirements
of the Discussion
instructions.
They: -Respond to
the question being

Points Range: 6
(20%) – 6 (20%)
Discussion
postings and
responses are
minimally
responsive to the
requirements of
the Discussion
instructions.
They: – do not

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 5 (16.67%)
Discussion
postings and
responses are
unresponsive to
the requirements
of the Discussion
instructions.
They: – do not
clearly address the

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.