NURS 8210 Assignment Nursing Informatics Pioneers

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 8210 Assignment Nursing Informatics Pioneers

NURS 8210 Assignment Nursing Informatics Pioneers

Week 2 Assignment: Nursing Informatics Pioneers (3 PAGES, 6
REFERENCES, DEADLINE FRIDAY)
One of the major drivers in recent health care reform legislation is the American Reinvestment and
Recovery Act's (ARRA) HiTech Incentive. This act, passed in 2009, earmarked $22 billion for the
adoption of electronic health records (EHRs), with a goal of 100% adoption in all practice settings by the
year 2014. The HiTech Act provides an example of the pivotal role that health information technology
plays in the delivery of quality health care services. Yet, health information technology is a relatively new
field. This Application Assignment provides an opportunity for you to examine the contributions of
pioneers in this arena and consider how their contributions have influenced health informatics and nursing
practice today.
To prepare:
 Visit the AMIA Video Library 1: Nursing Informatics Pioneers webpage listed in the Learning
Resources.
 Review the biographies and video presentations of pioneers who are of interest to you, or may
hold a position that you aspire to achieve.
 Select two nursing informatics pioneers and conduct further research on their contributions.
 Consider how their contributions have influenced health information technology and nursing
practice today.

By Day 7 of Week 2
Write a scholarly 3- to 4-page paper comparing two nursing informatics pioneers. Synthesize your
thoughts using the bullets below as a guide:
 What are the professional accomplishments of each individual?
 How have their contributions influenced nursing practice?
 How have their contributions shaped the field of nursing informatics?
 What lessons can you take away from their experiences?
 What skills or ideas demonstrated by these leaders might you apply to your professional practice?
Grading Criteria

Document: Week 2 Application 1 Rubric (Word document)

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2

Week in Review
This week you examined the history of nursing informatics as well as the Technology Informatics
Guiding Education Reform (TIGER) initiatives that drive technology education for nurses. Next
week you will consider the health information technology needs and viewpoints of stakeholders within an
organization and examine the critical role that information systems play in evidence-based practices.

To go to the next week:
Week 2

ubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Name: NURS_8210_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

Exit

 Grid View
 List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
RESPONSIVENESS TO
DISCUSSION QUESTION

8 (26.67%) – 8 (26.67%)
Discussion postings and

7 (23.33%) – 7 (23.33%)
Discussion postings and

6 (20%) – 6 (20%)
Discussion postings and

0 (0%) – 5 (16.67%)
Discussion postings and

Discussion post minimum
requirements:
*The original posting must
be completed by
Wednesday, Day 3, at
11:59pm MST. Two response
postings to two different
peer original posts, on two
different days, are required
by Saturday, Day 6, at
11:59pm MST. Faculty
member inquiries require
responses, which are not
included in the minimum
number of posts. Your
Discussion Board postings
should be written in
standard edited English and
follow APA style for format
and grammar as closely as
possible given the
constraints of the online
platform. Be sure to support
the postings with specific
citations from this week's
Learning Resources as well
as resources available
through the Walden
University online databases.
Refer to the Essential Guide
to APA Style for Walden
Students to ensure your in-
text citations and reference
list are correct.

responses exceed the
requirements of the
Discussion instructions. They:
Respond to the question being
asked or the prompt provided;
– Go beyond what is required
in some meaningful way (e.g.,
the post contributes a new
dimension, unearths
something unanticipated); -Are
substantive, reflective, with
critical analysis and synthesis
representative of knowledge
gained from the course
readings and current credible
evidence. – Demonstrate
significant ability to generalize
and extend thinking and
evaluate theories or concepts
within the topic or context of
the discussion. -Demonstrate
that the student has read,
viewed, and considered the
Learning -Resources as well
as additional resources and
has read, viewed, or
considered a sampling of
colleagues' postings; -Exceed
the minimum requirements for
discussion posts*.

responses meet the
requirements of the
Discussion instructions. They:
-Respond to the question
being asked or the prompt
provided; -Are substantive,
reflective, with critical analysis
and synthesis representative
of knowledge gained from the
course readings and current
credible evidence.re –
Demonstrate ability to
generalize and extend thinking
and evaluate theories or
concepts within the topic or
context of the discussion. –
Demonstrate that the student
has read, viewed, and
considered the Learning
Resources and has read,
viewed, or considered a
sampling of colleagues'
postings -Meet the minimum
requirements for discussion
posts*.

responses are minimally
responsive to the
requirements of the
Discussion instructions. They:
– do not clearly address the
objectives of the discussion or
the question or prompt; and/or
-May (lack) lack in depth,
reflection, analysis, or
synthesis but rely more on
anecdotal than scholarly
evidence; and/or -Do not
adequately demonstrate that
the student has read, viewed,
and considered the Learning –
Resources and/or a sampling
of colleagues' postings; and/or
has posted by the due date at
least in part. – Lack ability to
generalize and extend thinking
and evaluate theories or
concepts within the topic or
context of the discussion. -Do
not meet the minimum
requirements for discussion
posts*.

responses are unresponsive to
the requirements of the
Discussion instructions. They:
– do not clearly address the
objectives of the discussion or
the question or prompt; and/or
– Lack in substance, reflection,
analysis, or synthesis but rely
more on anecdotal than
scholarly evidence. – Lack
ability to generalize and
extend thinking and evaluate
theories or concepts within the
topic or context of the
discussion. -Do not
demonstrate that the student
has read, viewed, and
considered the Learning
Resources and/or a sampling
of colleagues’ postings; and/or
does not meet the minimum
requirements for discussion
posts*.

CONTENT KNOWLEDGE 8 (26.67%) – 8 (26.67%)
Discussion postings and
responses: -demonstrate in-
depth understanding and
application of concepts and

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 8210 Assignment Nursing Informatics Pioneers

issues presented in the course
(e.g., insightful interpretations
including analysis, synthesis
and/or evaluation of topic; –

7 (23.33%) – 7 (23.33%)
Discussion postings and
responses: -demonstrate
understanding and application
of the concepts and issues
presented in the course,
presented with some
understanding and application
of concepts and issues

6 (20%) – 6 (20%)
Discussion postings and
responses: – demonstrate
minimal understanding of
concepts and issues
presented in the course, and,
although generally accurate,
display some omissions and/or
errors; –lack support by

0 (0%) – 5 (16.67%)
Discussion postings and
responses demonstrate: -A
lack of understanding of the
concepts and issues
presented in the course;
and/or are inaccurate, contain
many omissions and/or errors;
and/or are not supported by

are well supported by pertinent
research/evidence from a
variety of and multiple peer-
reviewed books and journals,
where appropriate; –
Demonstrate significant
mastery and
thoughtful/accurate application
of content, applicable skills or
strategies presented in the
course.

presented in the course (e.g.,
insightful interpretations
including analysis, synthesis
and/or evaluation of topic; -are
supported by
research/evidence from peer-
reviewed books and journals,
where appropriate; and ·
demonstrate some mastery
and application of content,
applicable skills, or strategies
presented in the course.

research/evidence and/or the
research/evidence is
inappropriate or marginal in
quality; and/or lack of analysis,
synthesis or evaluation of topic
– demonstrate minimal
content, skills or strategies
presented in the course. ——-
Contain numerous errors
when using the skills or
strategies presented in the
course

research/evidence; and/or lack
of analysis, synthesis or
evaluation of topic -Many
critical errors when discussing
content, applicable skills or
strategies presented in the
course.

CONTRIBUTION TO THE
DISCUSSION

8 (26.67%) – 8 (26.67%)
Discussion postings and
responses significantly
contribute to the quality of the
discussion/interaction and
thinking and learning by: –
providing Rich and relevant
examples; discerning and
thought-provoking ideas; and
stimulating thoughts and
probes; – -demonstrating
original thinking, new
perspectives, and extensive
synthesis of ideas supported
by the literature.

7 (23.33%) – 7 (23.33%)
Discussion postings and
responses contribute to the
quality of the
discussion/interaction and
thinking and learning by –
providing relevant examples;
thought-provoking ideas –
Demonstrating synthesis of
ideas supported by the
literature

6 (20%) – 6 (20%)
Discussion postings and
responses minimally
contribute to the quality of
discussion/interaction and
thinking and learning by: –
providing few and/or irrelevant
examples; and/or – providing
few if any thought- provoking
ideas; and/or -. Information
that is restated from the
literature with no/little
demonstration of critical
thinking or synthesis of ideas.

0 (0%) – 5 (16.67%)
Discussion postings and
responses do not contribute to
the quality of
interaction/discussion and
thinking and learning as they
do not: -Provide examples (or
examples are irrelevant);
and/or -Include interesting
thoughts or ideas; and/or –
Demonstrate of critical thinking
or synthesis of ideas

QUALITY OF WRITING 6 (20%) – 6 (20%)
Discussion postings and
responses exceed doctoral –
level writing expectations.
They: · Use grammar and
syntax that is clear, concise,
and appropriate to doctoral
level writing; · Make few if any
errors in spelling, grammar,
and syntax; · Use original
language and refrain from
directly quoting original source
materials; -provide correct
APA · Are positive, courteous,
and respectful when offering
suggestions, constructive
feedback, or opposing
viewpoints.

5 (16.67%) – 5 (16.67%)
Discussion postings and
responses meet doctoral -level
writing expectations. They:
·Use grammar and syntax that
is clear and appropriate to
doctoral level writing; ; · Make
a few errors in spelling,
grammar, and syntax; ·
paraphrase but refrain from
directly quoting original source
materials; Provide correct APA
format · Are courteous and
respectful when offering
suggestions, constructive
feedback, or opposing
viewpoints;.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.