NURS 8002 Intra- and Interdisciplinary Collaboration Essay

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 8002 Intra- and Interdisciplinary Collaboration Essay

NURS 8002 Intra- and Interdisciplinary Collaboration Essay

You are the DNP-prepared nurse responsible for overseeing a large intensive care unit (ICU). You have
noticed that in the last 3 months, the number of nosocomial, or hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), has
dramatically increased among patients who have undergone cardiovascular procedures. You would like
to initiate a practice study to determine the source of these HAIs and to improve patient outcomes in
your ICU.

Photo Credit: Andrey Popov / Adobe Stock
What types of interdisciplinary collaboration might be needed to support the goals of your practice
study?
As outlined in the scenario, the likelihood to engage in interdisciplinary collaboration to enhance
healthcare delivery and nursing practice is high. In fact, it is likely that the DNP-prepared nurse in the
scenario presented may need to collaborate with an infection prevention specialist (who may be a PhD-
prepared nurse or PhD-credentialed healthcare professional). While this represents only one potential
area in which interprofessional collaboration may take place in advanced nursing practice, it is
important to keep in mind that when disciplines work together toward a shared goal that focuses on the
patient, the quality and cost of care delivered will be optimized (Johnson & Johnson, 2016).
For this Blog Assignment, review the Learning Resources and reflect on strategies that may be used to
foster interdisciplinary collaboration in nursing practice. Reflect on strategies and approaches you might
recommend that support interdisciplinary collaboration in practice.
Reference:
Johnson & Johnson. (2016). The importance of interprofessional collaboration in healthcare.
https://nursing.jnj.com/getting-real-nursing-today/the-importance-of-interprofessional-collaboration-in-healthcare
To prepare:
 Review the Henry et. al. (2018) article in this week’s Learning Resources about collaboration
through case study design.
 Reflect on how the approach of case study design may apply toward fostering intra- and
interdisciplinary collaboration in practice.
 Select at least one of the articles from this week’s Learning Resources and reflect on how
professional collaboration is executed to address the needs described in the article.
 Reflect on your own experiences with intra- and interdisciplinary collaboration in your practice.
By Day 3 of Week 6
Post a response to your Blog describing your own experiences with intra- and interdisciplinary
collaboration in your practice. What were the strengths and weaknesses of this collaboration? How
might your own experiences mirror the perspectives and viewpoints presented in the Henry et al. (2018)
case study design approach? Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 5 of Week 6
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two
different days by expanding on your colleague’s post or suggesting an alternative viewpoint/perspective
on the experiences described by your colleagues.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:
Week 6 Blog Rubric

Post by Day 3 of Week 6 and Respond by Day 5 of Week 6

To Participate in this Blog:
Week 6 Blog

What’s Coming Up in Week 7?

Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images
Next week, you will evaluate community and organizational needs, challenges, and issues. You will then
examine the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in addressing and advocating for community and
organizational needs, challenges, and issues.
Next Week

To go to the next week:
Week 7
Week 6: The Doctorally Prepared Nurse: Professional Collaboration
As a DNP-prepared nurse, the likelihood that you will engage in interprofessional collaboration is quite
high. In fact, you may already find that you engage in such collaborations daily. In the modern
healthcare delivery system, team-based approaches are more common in developing treatment plans

that not only address a patient’s needs but that foster long-term and positive patient outcomes. How do
you anticipate engaging in interprofessional collaboration in your nursing practice?
This week, you will examine intra- and interdisciplinary collaboration in nursing practice. You will also
consider the strengths and weaknesses of interdisciplinary collaboration in nursing practice.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
 Analyze intra- and interdisciplinary collaboration in nursing practice
 Analyze strengths and weaknesses of interdisciplinary collaboration in nursing practice

Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)

Ansa, B. E., Zechariah, S., Gates, A. M., Johnson, S. W., Heboyan, V., & De Leo, G. (2020). Attitudes and
behavior towards interprofessional collaboration among healthcare professionals in a large academic
medical center. Healthcare, 8(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8030323

Celio, J., Ninane, F., Bugnon, O., & Schneider, M. P. (2018). Pharmacist-nurse collaborations in
medication adherence-enhancing interventions: A review. Patient Education and Counseling, 101(7),
1175–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.01.022

Contandriopoulos, D., Brousselle, A., Dubois, C.-A., Perroux, M., Beaulieu, M.-D., Brault, I., Kilpatrick, K.,
D’Amour, D., & Sansgter-Gormley, E. (2015). A process-based framework to guide nurse practitioners
integration into primary healthcare teams: Results from a logic analysis. BMC Health Services Research,
15(78), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0731-5

Henry, B., Male, B., Garner, C., & Guernon, A. (2018). Teaching and learning about interprofessional
collaboration through student-designed case study and analysis. International Journal of Teaching and
Learning in Higher Education, 30(3), 560–570.

Interprofessional Education Collaborative. (2016). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative
practice: 2016 update. https://hsc.unm.edu/ipe/resources/ipec-2016-core-competencies.pdf

Muller, C., Hesjedal-Streller, B., Fleischmann, N., Tetzlaff, B., Mallon, T., Scherer, M., Kopke, S., Balzer, K.,
Gartner, L., Maurer, I., Friede, T., Konig, H.-H., & Hummers, E. (2020). Effects of strategies to improve
general practitioner-nurse collaboration and communication in regard to hospital admissions of nursing
home residents (interprof ACT): Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials, 21(913),
1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04736-x

National League for Nursing. (2015). Interprofessional collaboration in education and practice.
http://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/ipe-ipp-vision.pdf?sfvrsn=14

Module 3: Collaboration and the DNP Community of Practice
Interprofessional collaboration, or coordinating care between various disciplines, has resulted in
widespread reduction of inefficiencies in patient care. As it applies to nursing practice, cooperative work
allows for more effective treatment plans and a focus on the whole patient, eliminating independent
work and divides that previously served to isolate healthcare delivery.
In what ways might you already participate in interprofessional collaboration in your nursing practice?
What potential benefits might arise from fostering a community of practice in nursing?
What's Happening This Module?
Module 3: Collaboration and the DNP Community of Practice is a 2-week module—Weeks 6–7 of the
course—in which you examine intra- and interdisciplinary collaboration in nursing practice, including the
strengths and challenges associated with these types of collaboration. In your Blog Assignments for this
module, you will extend your understanding of these types of collaboration strategies while you also
analyze your role as the DNP-prepared nurse in evaluating community and organizational needs,
challenges, and issues. With these community and organizational considerations in mind, you will
recommend practice changes and interventions to address those considerations, in essence, performing
one of the core functions of the DNP-prepared nurse.
What do I have to do?     When do I have to do it?

Review your Learning Resources Days 1–7, Weeks 6 and 7

Blog: How Do You Practice Intra- and
Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Practice?

Post by Day 3 of Week 6 and respond to
your colleagues by Day 6 of Week 6.

Blog: The DNP-Prepared Nurse and Their
Community

Post by Day 3 of Week 7 and respond to
your colleagues by Day 6 of Week 7.

Go to the Week's Content

Week 6

Week 7
Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Name: NURS_8002_Week6_Blog_Rubric

Exit

 Grid View
 List View
Excellent
90%–100%

Good
80%–89%

Fair
70%–79%

Poor
0%–69%

Main Posting:

Response to the Blog
prompt is reflective with
critical analysis and
synthesis representative of
knowledge gained from the
course readings for the
module and current credible
sources

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 8002 Intra- and Interdisciplinary Collaboration Essay

18 (30%) – 20 (33.33%)
Thoroughly responds to the
Blog prompt(s).
Is reflective with critical
analysis and synthesis
representative of knowledge
gained from the course
readings for the module and/or
current practice experiences.
No less than 75% of post has
exceptional depth and

16 (26.67%) – 17 (28.33%)
Responds to most of the Blog
prompt(s).
Is somewhat reflective with
critical analysis and synthesis
representative of knowledge
gained from the course
readings for the module and/or
current practice experiences.
50% of the post has
exceptional depth and

14 (23.33%) – 15 (25%)
Responds to some of the Blog
prompt(s).
One to two criteria are not
addressed or are superficially
addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection
and critical analysis and
synthesis.
Somewhat represents

0 (0%) – 13 (21.67%)
Does not respond to the Blog
prompt(s).
Lacks depth or superficially
addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical
analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge
gained from the course
readings for the module.

breadth. breadth. knowledge gained from the
course readings for the
module.

Main Posting:

Writing

5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)
Written clearly and concisely.
Contains no grammatical or
spelling errors.
Adheres to current APA
manual writing rules and style.

4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)
Written concisely.
May contain one to two
grammatical or spelling errors.
Adheres to current APA
manual writing rules and style.

3 (5%) – 3 (5%)
Written somewhat concisely.
May contain more than two
spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting
errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)
Not written clearly or
concisely.
Contains more than two
spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current
APA manual writing rules and
style.

Main Posting:

Timely and full participation

5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)
Meets requirements for timely,
full, and active participation.
Posts main Blog post by due
date.

4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)
Posts main Discussion by due
date.
Meets requirements for full
participation.

3 (5%) – 3 (5%)
Posts main Blog post by due
date.

0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)
Does not meet requirements
for full participation.
Does not post main Blog post
by due date.

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main
post that is reflective.

5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)
Response exhibits critical
thinking and application to
practice settings.
Responds to questions posed
by faculty.

4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)
Response has some depth
and may exhibit critical
thinking or application to
practice setting.

3 (5%) – 3 (5%)
Response is on topic and may
have some depth.

0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)
Response may not be on topic
and lacks depth.

First Response:
Writing

5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)
Communication is professional
and respectful to colleagues.
Response fully answers
faculty questions, if posed.
Provides clear, concise
opinions and ideas.
Response is effectively written
in standard, edited English.

4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)
Communication is mostly
professional and respectful to
colleagues.
Response mostly answers
faculty questions, if posed.
Provides opinions and ideas.
Response is written in
standard, edited English.

3 (5%) – 3 (5%)
Response posed in the Blog
may lack effective professional
communication.
Response somewhat answers
faculty questions, if posed.

0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)
Responses posted in the Blog
lack effective communication.
Response to faculty questions
is missing.

First Response:
Timely and full participation

5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)
Meets requirements for timely,
full, and active participation.

4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)
Meets requirements for full
participation.

3 (5%) – 3 (5%)
Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)
Does not meet requirements
for full participation.

Posts by due date. Posts by due date. Does not post by due date.

Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main
post that is reflective.

5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)
Response exhibits critical
thinking and application to
practice settings.
Responds to questions posed
by faculty.

4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)
Response has some depth
and may exhibit critical
thinking or application to
practice setting.

3 (5%) – 3 (5%)
Response is on topic and may
have some depth.

0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)
Response may not be on topic
and lacks depth.

Second Response:
Writing

5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)
Communication is professional
and respectful to colleagues.
Response fully answers
faculty questions, if posed.
Provides clear, concise
opinions and ideas.
Response is effectively written
in standard, edited English.

4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)
Communication is mostly
professional and respectful to
colleagues.
Response mostly answers
faculty questions, if posed.
Provides opinions and ideas.
Response is written in
standard, edited English.

3 (5%) – 3 (5%)
Response posed in the Blog
may lack effective professional
communication.
Response somewhat answers
faculty questions, if posed.

0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)
Responses posted in the Blog
lack effective communication.
Response to faculty questions
is missing.

Second Response:
Timely and full participation

5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)
Meets requirements for timely,
full, and active participation.
Posts by due date.

4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)
Meets requirements for full
participation.
Posts by due date.

3 (5%) – 3 (5%)
Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)
Does not meet requirements
for full participation.
Does not post by due date.

Total Points: 60
Name: NURS_8002_Week6_Blog_Rubric

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.