NURS 6340 Assignment Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 6340 Assignment Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

NURS 6340 Assignment Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

In general, healthcare supply entails recognizing population-wide health concerns and implementing realistic intervention strategies. As a result, rules are being developed to streamline treatment delivery as healthcare providers continue to discover how to enhance results.
The overall goal of care providers is to improve patient safety while continually seeking to improve quality. However, various healthcare stresses impair care delivery and prevent healthcare workers from fulfilling the specified goals, thus everything does not proceed as planned. This report examines the organizational effects of nursing shortages as a relevant healthcare issue and highlights evidence-based remedies used by other organizations.

The Nursing Shortage Problem

In practice, healthcare providers should be kept free from exhaustion. The care providers
to patient ratio should be manageable such that healthcare providers are not physically and
mentally drained. Nursing shortage occurs when the number of patients is high to the extent that
care providers cannot provide satisfactory services. The problem creates an environment where
care providers are highly dissatisfied and ready to leave (Chang et al., 2017). In response, it has
been the cause of 25% nurse turnover in the organization, with 10% of the care providers leaving
the profession entirely. This data shows a lack of motivation to continue offering healthcare
services irrespective of other measures such as rewards the organization applies to inspire
employees.

NURS 6340 Assignment Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

NURS 6340 Assignment Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

Undeniably, this proportion of turnover is high and implies two things. Firstly, the
organization will continue using massive resources to replace the lost workforce. Doing so leads
to a scenario where some areas are underserved since resources are used wrongly. Secondly,
turnover increases the healthcare burden to the employees left serving. Since the ones left behind
are overworked, they are easily frustrated and can quit too. Eventually, a cycle where patients are
underserved and dissatisfied ensues. Such instances reduce the overall quality of care and make
it challenging to achieve the set objectives.

Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue
The Quadruple Aim provides broad categories of goals to pursue to maintain and improve
healthcare. Within each goal are many issues that, if addressed successfully, may have a positive
impact on outcomes. For example, healthcare leaders are being tasked to shift from an emphasis
on disease management often provided in an acute care setting to health promotion and disease
prevention delivered in primary care settings. Efforts in this area can have significant positive
impacts by reducing the need for primary healthcare and by reducing the stress on the healthcare
system.
according to NURS 6340 Assignment Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue, changes in the industry only serve to stress what has always been true; namely, that the
healthcare field has always faced significant challenges, and that goals to improve healthcare will
always involve multiple stakeholders. This should not seem surprising given the circumstances.
Indeed, when a growing population needs care, there are factors involved such as the demands of
providing that care and the rising costs associated with healthcare. Generally, it is not surprising
that the field of healthcare is an industry facing multifaceted issues that evolve over time.
In this module’s Discussion, you reviewed some healthcare issues/stressors and selected one for
further review. For this Assignment, you will consider in more detail the healthcare issue/stressor
you selected. You will also review research that addresses the issue/stressor and write a white
paper to your organization’s leadership that addresses the issue/stressor you selected.
To Prepare:
 Review the national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the Resources and reflect on
the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for study.
 Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post for
the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
 Identify and review two additional scholarly resources (not included in the Resources for
this module) that focus on change strategies implemented by healthcare organizations to
address your selected national healthcare issue/stressor.

The Assignment (3-4 Pages):
Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue
Develop a 3- to 4-page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing your
selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to
address the following:
 Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your
organization. Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance
from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization).
 Provide a brief summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources on the
national healthcare issue/stressor. Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being
addressed in other organizations.
 Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare
issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected. Explain how they may
impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide
examples.
Looking Ahead
The paper you develop in Module 1 will be revisited and revised in Module 2. Review the
Assignment instructions for Module 2 to prepare for your revised paper.
By Day 7 of Week 2
Submit your paper.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
 Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first
initial.(extension)” as the name.
 Click the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the
Assignment.
 Click the Week 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading
criteria from this area.
 Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the
document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
 If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit
my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
 Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
 Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 7 days to
provide you with quality feedback.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:
Week 2 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment Draft for Authenticity:
Submit your Week 2  Assignment draft and review the originality report

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2

To participate in this Assignment:
Week 2 Assignment

Next Module

To go to the next module:
Module 2
Module 1: Healthcare Environment (Weeks 1-2)
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Healthcare Environment [Video file]. Baltimore,
MD: Author.
Learning Objectives
Students will:

 Analyze current national healthcare issues/stressors
 Analyze the impact of national healthcare issues/stressors on healthcare organizations
 Analyze strategies for addressing national healthcare issues/stressors
Due By Assignment
Week 1, Days 1–2 Read the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 1, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose your Assignment.

Week 1, Days 4-5

Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 1, Day 6 Post two peer Discussion responses.
Week 2, Days 1–6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 2, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.

Learning Resources
Required Readings
Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert
clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

 Chapter 2, “Transformational Leadership: Complexity, Change, and Strategic
Planning” (pp. 34–62)
 Chapter 3, “Current Challenges in Complex Health Care Organizations and the
Quadruple Aim” (pp. 66–97)

Read any TWO of the following (plus TWO additional readings on your selected issue):

Auerbach, D. I., Staiger, D. O., & Buerhaus, P. I. (2018). Growing ranks of advanced practice
clinicians—Implications for the physician workforce. New England Journal of Medicine,
378(25), 2358–2360.

Gerardi, T., Farmer, P., & Hoffman, B. (2018). Moving closer to the 2020 BSN-prepared
workforce goal. American Journal of Nursing, 118(2), 43–45.

Jacobs, B., McGovern, J., Heinmiller, J., & Drenkard, K. (2018). Engaging employees in well-
being: Moving from the Triple Aim to the Quadruple Aim. Nursing Administration Quarterly,
42(3), 231–245.

Norful, A. A., de Jacq, K., Carlino, R., & Poghosyan, L. (2018). Nurse practitioner–physician
comanagement: A theoretical model to alleviate primary care strain. Annals of Family Medicine,
16(3), 250–256.

Palumbo, M., Rambur, B., & Hart, V. (2017). Is health care payment reform impacting nurses'
work settings, roles, and education preparation? Journal of Professional Nursing, 33(6),
400–404.

Park, B., Gold, S. B., Bazemore, A., & Liaw, W. (2018). How evolving United States payment
models influence primary care and its impact on the Quadruple Aim. Journal of the American
Board of Family Medicine, 31(4), 588–604.

Pittman, P., & Scully-Russ, E. (2016). Workforce planning and development in times of delivery
system transformation. Human Resources for Health, 14(56), 1–15. doi:10.1186/s12960-016-
0154-3. Retrieved from
https://human-resources-health.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12960-016-0154-3

Poghosyan, L., Norful, A., & Laugesen, M. (2018). Removing restrictions on nurse practitioners'
scope of practice in New York state: Physicians' and nurse practitioners' perspectives. Journal of
the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 30(6), 354–360.

Ricketts, T., & Fraher, E. (2013). Reconfiguring health workforce policy so that education,
training, and actual delivery of care are closely connected. Health Affairs, 32(11), 1874–1880.

Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2015). Leading in Healthcare Organizations of the Future
[Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Discussion: Review of Current Healthcare Issues
If you were to ask 10 people what they believe to be the most significant issue facing healthcare
today, you might get 10 different answers. Escalating costs? Regulation? Technology disruption?
These and many other topics are worthy of discussion. Not surprisingly, much has been said in
the research, within the profession, and in the news about these topics. Whether they are issues
of finance, quality, workload, or outcomes, there is no shortage of changes to be addressed.
In this Discussion, you examine a national healthcare issue and consider how that issue may
impact your work setting. You also analyze how your organization has responded to this issue.
To Prepare:
 Review the Resources and select one current national healthcare issue/stressor to focus
on.
 Reflect on the current national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and think about how
this issue/stressor may be addressed in your work setting.
By Day 3 of Week 1
Post a description of the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for analysis, and explain
how the healthcare issue/stressor may impact your work setting. Then, describe how your health
system work setting has responded to the healthcare issue/stressor, including a description of
what changes may have been implemented. Be specific and provide examples.
By Day 6 of Week 1
Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who chose a different national
healthcare issue/stressor than you selected. Explain how their chosen national healthcare
issue/stressor may also impact your work setting and what (if anything) is being done to address
the national healthcare issue/stressor.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:
Week 1 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1

To participate in this Discussion:
Week 1 Discussion

Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6053_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
 Grid View
 List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Develop a 3- to 4-
page paper,
written to your
organization's
leadership team,
addressing the
selected national
healthcare
issue/stressor and
how it is
impacting your
work setting. Be
sure to address
the following:
·   Describe the

Points Range: 23
(23%) – 25 (25%)
The response
accurately and
thoroughly
describes in detail
the national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected and its
impact on an
organization.
The response
includes accurate,
clear, and detailed

Points Range: 20
(20%) – 22 (22%)
The response
describes the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected and its
impact on an
organization.
The response
includes accurate
data to quantify
the impact of the
national

Points Range: 18
(18%) – 19 (19%)
The response
describes the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected and its
impact on an
organization that
is vague or
inaccurate.
The response
includes vague or
inaccurate data to

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 17 (17%)
The response
describes the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected and its
impact on an
organization that
is vague and
inaccurate, or is
missing.
The response
includes vague

national
healthcare
issue/stressor you
selected and its
impact on your
organization. Use
organizational
data to quantify
the impact (if
necessary, seek
assistance from
leadership or
appropriate
stakeholders in
your
organization).

data to quantify
the impact of the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.

healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.

quantify the
impact of the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.

and inaccurate
data to quantify
the impact of the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected, or is
missing.

·   Provide a brief
summary of the
two articles you
reviewed from
outside resources,
on the national
healthcare
issue/stressor and
explain how the
healthcare
issue/stressor is
being addressed
in other
organizations.

Points Range: 27
(27%) – 30 (30%)
A complete,
detailed, and
specific synthesis
of two outside
resources
reviewed on the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected is
provided. The
response fully
integrates at least
2 outside
resources and 2 or
3 course-specific
resources that
fully support the
summary
provided.
The response
accurately and
thoroughly
explains in detail
how the
healthcare
issue/stressor is

Points Range: 24
(24%) – 26 (26%)
An accurate
synthesis of at
least one outside
resource reviewed
on the

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 6340 Assignment Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected is
provided. The
response
integrates at least
1 outside resource
and 2 or 3 course-
specific resources
that may support
the summary
provided.
The response
explains how the
healthcare
issue/stressor is
being addressed in
other
organizations.

Points Range: 21
(21%) – 23 (23%)
A vague or
inaccurate
summary of
outside resources
reviewed on the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected is
provided. The
response
minimally
integrates
resources that may
support the
summary
provided.
The response
explains how the
healthcare
issue/stressor is
being addressed in
other
organizations that
is vague or
inaccurate.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 20 (20%)
A vague and
inaccurate
summary of no
outside resources
reviewed on the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected is
provided, or is
missing.
The response fails
to integrate any
resources to
support the
summary
provided.

being addressed in
other
organizations.

·   Summarize the
strategies used to
address the
organizational
impact of
national
healthcare
issues/stressors
presented in the
scholarly
resources you
selected and
explain how they
may impact your
organization both
positively and
negatively. Be
specific and
provide
examples.

Points Range: 27
(27%) – 30 (30%)
A complete,
detailed, and
accurate summary
of the strategies
used to address
the organizational
impact of the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor is
provided.
The response
accurately and
thoroughly
explains in detail
how the strategies
may impact an
organization both
positively and
negatively, with
specific and
accurate
examples.

Points Range: 24
(24%) – 26 (26%)
An accurate
summary of the
strategies used to
address the
organizational
impact of the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor is
provided.
The response
explains how the
strategies may
impact an
organization both
positively and
negatively. May
include some
specific examples.

Points Range: 21
(21%) – 23 (23%)
A vague or
inaccurate
summary of the
strategies used to
address the
organizational
impact of the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor is
provided.
The response
explains how the
strategies may
impact an
organization both
positively and
negatively that is
vague or
inaccurate. May
include some
vague or
inaccurate
examples.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 20 (20%)
A vague and
inaccurate
summary of the
strategies used to
address the
organizational
impact of the
national
healthcare
issue/stressor is
provided, or is
missing.
The response
explains how the
strategies may
impact an
organization both
positively and
negatively that is
vague and
inaccurate, or is
missing. Does not
include any
examples.

as stated in NURS 6340 Assignment Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue, written
Expression and
Formatting –
Paragraph
Development and
Organization:
Paragraphs make
clear points that
support well-
developed ideas,
flow logically,
and demonstrate
continuity of
ideas. Sentences
are carefully

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow,
continuity, and
clarity.
A clear and
comprehensive
purpose statement,
introduction, and
conclusion is
provided which
delineates all

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow,
continuity, and
clarity 80% of the
time.
Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of the
assignment is
stated, yet is brief
and not

Points Range: 3.5
(3.5%) – 3.5
(3.5%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow,
continuity, and
clarity 60%–79%
of the time.
Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of the
assignment is
vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow,
continuity, and
clarity < 60% of
the time.
No purpose
statement,
introduction, or
conclusion was
provided.

focused—neither
long and
rambling nor
short and lacking
substance. A
clear and
comprehensive
purpose
statement and
introduction is
provided which
delineates all
required criteria.

required criteria. descriptive.

Written
Expression and
Formatting –
English writing
standards:
Correct
grammar,
mechanics, and
proper
punctuation

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation with
no errors.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1
or 2) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.

Points Range: 3.5
(3.5%) – 3.5
(3.5%)
Contains several
(3 or 4) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.

https://www.google.com/

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥
5) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation errors
that interfere with
the reader’s
understanding.

Written
Expression and
Formatting – The
paper follows
correct APA
format for title
page, headings,
font,
spacing, margins,
indentations,
page numbers,
parenthetical/in-
text citations, and
reference list.

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA
format with no
errors.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1
or 2) APA format
errors.

Points Range: 3.5
(3.5%) – 3.5
(3.5%)
Contains several
(3 or 4) APA
format errors.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥
5) APA format
errors.

Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6053_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.