NURS 6053 Staffing Shortages As a National Health are Stressor

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 6053 Staffing Shortages As a National Health are Stressor

NURS 6053 Staffing Shortages As a National Health are Stressor

Week 1 Discussion – Main Post Collapse
Main Article

As a national health issue/stressor, staffing shortages

Staffing shortages in the health-care profession have become a major concern and source of stress across the country. It is no secret that nurses work exceedingly hard. Patient loads are fast increasing as a result of impending health-care staffing shortages and an increase in the number of patients requesting care services, making it challenging for nurses who are already short-staffed to properly and efficiently handle all patient care needs (Bakhamis et al.,2019). The nursing shortage in the United States is severe, and it is only expected to worsen. Nursing posts are not being filled quickly enough to meet demand due to an inflow of patients into our health system, the retirement of baby boomers, and educational bottlenecks (Xue et al., 2016). On the front lines, nurses are overworked and understaffed. In the United States, there are millions of registered and licensed practical nurses. The majority of these nurses, on the other hand, are not happy or at ease in their jobs; they are stressed, overworked, undervalued, and underutilized, which has a considerable influence on care delivery.
Impact on the Workplace

Staffing shortages can have a significant impact on the quality of work, on productivity,
creativity, competitiveness, nursing care outcomes, and on ensuring patients’ safety (Norful et
al., 2018). At my health care organization due to staffing shortage, nurses sometimes work long
hours because other nurses calling in sick, running one to four hours late from working under

very stressful conditions resulting in burnout, injury, fatigue, and job dissatisfaction. Nurses
suffering in my health care facility delay treatments and make other mistakes due to the
relationship of the nurse-to-patient ratio (Xue et al., 2016). An unfortunate outcome is that
patient quality of care suffers, resulting in a variety of complications including emergency room
overcrowding and delay of treatment.

NURS 6053 Staffing Shortages As a National Health are Stressor

NURS 6053 Staffing Shortages As a National Health are Stressor

Organizational Response and Changes Implemented

A range of solutions has been offered as a way to solve the nursing shortage in my health care
organization from subsidized funding, hiring new nurses, wage increases, and contracting with
nursing agencies for nurses to fill in periodically. My health care organization provides tuition
for nurses seeking to advance their degree. In addition, resources have been allocated towards
increasing wages which has affected recruitment as well as retention of Registered Nurses
already in the facility.
Another important strategy to further address the nursing shortage is that, nurses are allowed
scheduling flexibility and coverage. This has help nurses to juggle their busy work schedule with
home life and educational opportunities, and also allows room for decompressing between
stressful, emotionally demanding shifts and days of work.
Health care of the nation, and patients, in particular will benefit the most from adequate
staffing and a healthy and well rested nurse because efficiency and productivity will increase, the
number of work-related mistakes at the same time will reduce, sick leaves are going to be rare,
shorter, and burnout will not occur often (Norful et al., 2018). By introducing said strategies, we
would not only increase staffing in health care but equally, reduce the stress-related illness rate
among nurses and would also significantly raise the quality of healthcare and patient outcomes.

Discussion: Review of Current Healthcare Issues
If you were to ask 10 people what they believe to be the most significant issue facing healthcare
today, you might get 10 different answers. Escalating costs? Regulation? Technology disruption?
These and many other topics are worthy of discussion. Not surprisingly, much has been said in
the research, within the profession, and in the news about these topics. Whether they are issues
of finance, quality, workload, or outcomes, there is no shortage of changes to be addressed.
In this Discussion, you examine a national healthcare issue and consider how that issue may
impact your work setting. You also analyze how your organization has responded to this issue.
To Prepare:
 Review the Resources and select one current national healthcare issue/stressor to focus
on.
 Reflect on the current national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and think about how
this issue/stressor may be addressed in your work setting.
By Day 3 of Week 1
Post a description of the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for analysis, and explain
how the healthcare issue/stressor may impact your work setting. Then, describe how your health
system work setting has responded to the healthcare issue/stressor, including a description of
what changes may have been implemented. Be specific and provide examples.
By Day 6 of Week 1
Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who chose a different national
healthcare issue/stressor than you selected. Explain how their chosen national healthcare
issue/stressor may also impact your work setting and what (if anything) is being done to address
the national healthcare issue/stressor.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:
Week 1 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1

To participate in this Discussion:
Week 1 Discussion

Module 1: Healthcare Environment (Weeks 1-2)
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Healthcare Environment [Video file]. Baltimore,
MD: Author.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
 Analyze current national healthcare issues/stressors
 Analyze the impact of national healthcare issues/stressors on healthcare organizations
 Analyze strategies for addressing national healthcare issues/stressors
Due By Assignment
Week 1, Days 1–2 Read the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 1, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose your Assignment.

Week 1, Days 4-5

https://www.google.com/

Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 1, Day 6 Post two peer Discussion responses.
Week 2, Days 1–6 Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 2, Day 7 Deadline to submit your Assignment.

Learning Resources
Required Readings
Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert
clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

 Chapter 2, “Transformational Leadership: Complexity, Change, and Strategic
Planning” (pp. 34–62)
 Chapter 3, “Current Challenges in Complex Health Care Organizations and the
Quadruple Aim” (pp. 66–97)

Read any TWO of the following (plus TWO additional readings on your selected issue):

Auerbach, D. I., Staiger, D. O., & Buerhaus, P. I. (2018). Growing ranks of advanced practice
clinicians—Implications for the physician workforce. New England Journal of Medicine,
378(25), 2358–2360.

Gerardi, T., Farmer, P., & Hoffman, B. (2018). Moving closer to the 2020 BSN-prepared
workforce goal. American Journal of Nursing, 118(2), 43–45.

Jacobs, B., McGovern, J., Heinmiller, J., & Drenkard, K. (2018). Engaging employees in well-
being: Moving from the Triple Aim to the Quadruple Aim. Nursing Administration Quarterly,
42(3), 231–245.

Norful, A. A., de Jacq, K., Carlino, R., & Poghosyan, L. (2018). Nurse practitioner–physician
comanagement: A theoretical model to alleviate primary care strain. Annals of Family Medicine,
16(3), 250–256.

Palumbo, M., Rambur, B., & Hart, V. (2017). Is health care payment reform impacting nurses'
work settings, roles, and education preparation? Journal of Professional Nursing, 33(6),
400–404.

Park, B., Gold, S. B., Bazemore, A., & Liaw, W. (2018). How evolving United States payment
models influence primary care and its impact on the Quadruple Aim. Journal of the American
Board of Family Medicine, 31(4), 588–604.

Pittman, P., & Scully-Russ, E. (2016). Workforce planning and development in times of delivery
system transformation. Human Resources for Health, 14(56), 1–15. doi:10.1186/s12960-016-
0154-3. Retrieved from
https://human-resources-health.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12960-016-0154-3

Poghosyan, L., Norful, A., & Laugesen, M. (2018). Removing restrictions on nurse practitioners'
scope of practice in New York state: Physicians' and nurse practitioners' perspectives. Journal of
the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 30(6), 354–360.

Ricketts, T., & Fraher, E. (2013). Reconfiguring health workforce policy so that education,
training, and actual delivery of care are closely connected. Health Affairs, 32(11), 1874–1880.

Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2015). Leading in Healthcare Organizations of the Future
[Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6053_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric
 Grid View
 List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting Points Range: 45
(45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts

Points Range: 40
(40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the

Points Range: 35
(35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond

of the discussion
question(s)
expectations with
reflective critical
analysis and
synthesis of
knowledge gained
from the course
readings for the
module and
current credible
sources.

Supported by at
least three current,
credible sources.

Written clearly
and concisely with
no grammatical or
spelling errors and
fully adheres to
current APA
manual writing
rules and style.

discussion
question(s) and is
reflective with
critical analysis
and synthesis of
knowledge gained
from the course
readings for the
module.

At least 75% of
post has
exceptional depth
and breadth.

Supported by at
least three
credible sources.

Written clearly
and concisely with
one or no
grammatical or
spelling errors and
fully adheres to
current APA
manual writing
rules and style.

of the discussion
question(s).

One or two
criteria are not
addressed or are
superficially
addressed.

Is somewhat
lacking reflection
and critical
analysis and
synthesis.

Somewhat
represents
knowledge gained
from the course
readings for the
module.

Post is cited with
two credible
sources.

Written somewhat
concisely; may
contain more than
two spelling or
grammatical
errors.

Contains some

to the discussion

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 6053 Staffing Shortages As a National Health are Stressor

question(s)
adequately.

Lacks depth or
superficially
addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection
and critical
analysis and
synthesis.

Does not represent
knowledge gained
from the course
readings for the
module.

Contains only one
or no credible
sources.

Not written
clearly or
concisely.

Contains more
than two spelling
or grammatical
errors.
APA formatting
errors.

Does not adhere
to current APA
manual writing
rules and style.

Main Post:
Timeliness

Points Range: 10
(10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post
by day 3.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by
day 3.

First Response Points Range: 17
(17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits
synthesis, critical
thinking, and
application to
practice settings.

Responds fully to
questions posed
by faculty.

Provides clear,
concise opinions
and ideas that are
supported by at
least two scholarly
sources.

Demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding of
learning
objectives.

Communication is
professional and
respectful to
colleagues.

Points Range: 15
(15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits
critical thinking
and application to
practice settings.

Communication is
professional and
respectful to
colleagues.

Responses to
faculty questions
are answered, if
posed.

Provides clear,
concise opinions
and ideas that are
supported by two
or more credible
sources.

Response is
effectively written
in standard, edited
English.

Points Range: 13
(13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on
topic and may
have some depth.

Responses posted
in the discussion
may lack effective
professional
communication.

Responses to
faculty questions
are somewhat
answered, if
posed.

https://www.google.com/

Response may
lack clear, concise
opinions and
ideas, and a few
or no credible
sources are cited.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not
be on topic and
lacks depth.

Responses posted
in the discussion
lack effective
professional
communication.

Responses to
faculty questions
are missing.

No credible
sources are cited.

Responses to
faculty questions
are fully
answered, if
posed.

Response is
effectively written
in standard, edited
English.
Second Response Points Range: 16
(16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits
synthesis, critical
thinking, and
application to
practice settings.

Responds fully to
questions posed
by faculty.

Provides clear,
concise opinions
and ideas that are
supported by at
least two scholarly
sources.

Demonstrates
synthesis and
understanding of
learning
objectives.
Points Range: 14
(14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits
critical thinking
and application to
practice settings.

Communication is
professional and
respectful to
colleagues.

Responses to
faculty questions
are answered, if
posed.

Provides clear,
concise opinions
and ideas that are
supported by two
or more credible
sources.
Points Range: 12
(12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on
topic and may
have some depth.

Responses posted
in the discussion
may lack effective
professional
communication.

https://www.google.com/

Responses to
faculty questions
are somewhat
answered, if
posed.

Response may
lack clear, concise
opinions and
ideas, and a few
or no credible
sources are cited.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not
be on topic and
lacks depth.

Responses posted
in the discussion
lack effective
professional
communication.

Responses to
faculty questions
are missing.

No credible
sources are cited.

Communication is
professional and
respectful to
colleagues.

Responses to
faculty questions
are fully
answered, if
posed.

Response is
effectively written
in standard, edited
English.

Response is
effectively written
in standard, edited
English.

Participation

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets
requirements for
participation by
posting on three
different days.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet
requirements for
participation by
posting on 3
different days.

Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6053_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.