NURS 6053 Developing Organizational Policies and Practices

NURS 6053 Developing Organizational Policies and Practices

Patients’ willingness to seek healthcare services from an institution is determined by the cost of medication. The quadruple’s objective The goal is to lower the cost of schooling and expand the population’s access to healthcare services. The cost of medication is determined by a variety of factors, including changing economic conditions and the need to expand an organization’s number of healthcare professionals. Institutions function with the goal of producing money from a business standpoint. As a result, in order to improve the quality of healthcare services provided to patients, healthcare facilities may be required to grow their workforce as well as other equipment required for efficient operations. Increased costs occur from the addition of resources, which must be passed on to the patients, who are the customers. As a result, the current study investigates the opposing viewpoint of forced overtime as a means of addressing patient needs while lowering medical costs.

In our study, whatever their profession, women had the highest levels of work-related stress during the first global lockdown. Our results concord with the literature revealing that women are more prone to stress, and may also suffer more from the negative psychological impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. Women often have a double life combining work and family life. This is even less reconcilable when both professional and family constraints increase. Indeed, families had to adapt to the closure of schools. Even in couples that shared the involvement in the education and care of children, women are still mostly implicated. Given these elements and the predominance of women in healthcare professionals, the WHO advised to study gender-specific consequences of the pandemic. Even if women have less severe forms of COVID, they were frightened of contracting COVID-19. They may also have been more impacted by the higher number of deaths and difficulties during the crisis. Women show greater psychophysiological concordance and consistency than men, and may therefore present more psychological vulnerability. Improving Work -Life Integration (WLI) is likely to improve healthcare worker’s quality of life, organizational outcomes and, ultimately, quality of care for patients (Schwartz et al., 2018).,

Healthcare System Taking action on burnout

According to National Libraryy of Medicine During COVID-19, employers were noticing the need for intervention. Through employee assistance programs (EAPs) or health care insurance, mental health programs were offered. Some programs offered by mental health staff are stress reduction, cognitive restructuring and reframing, and grief counseling. Mental health can also help a nurse to recognize and admit to symptoms of burnout. COVID-19 was an introduction of EAPs and mental health checks that should occur routinely. Nurses will not always admit or even recognize that they need mental health support. However, if one knows the signs of burnout, they can see it in nurses.

The national collaborative, which rolled out in 2017, has three main goals: better understanding the challenges to clinician well-being, raising the visibility of clinician stress and burnout, and elevating evidence-based solutions. To date, the collaborative has received commitments from more than 150 organizations, including health systems, hospitals, medical schools and state medical boards, to improve clinician well-being and curb burnout.

Jonathan Ripp, MD, MPH, chief wellness officer at Mount Sinai Health System in New York City also co-chairs the national Collaborative for Healing and Renewal in Medicine, which this March co-published a first-of-its-kind charter in the Journal of the American Medical Association that outlines fundamental principles for supporting provider well-being. The charter has been endorsed by more than a dozen organizations, including the American Medical Association and Association of American Medical Colleges.

Preventing, promoting appropriate support for healthcare workers may significantly reduce the effects contibutind to burnouts in organization;

Strong Interpersonal Relationships outside of work
Work-Life Balance
Healthy Lifestyle
Decrease Stress
Mindfulness
Education
Recognize Achievements
Healthy work Enviroment
Recommendtions
Therapy

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic has and will have consequences for every population. Nevertheless, healthcare professionals were more impacted than other workers by work-related stress. Paramedical staff were more impacted on than physicians. Across all occupational categories, age appears to mitigate work-related stress, and maybe due to the effects of experience. We were able to identify risk factors for high levels of work-related stress such as youth, female gender, paramedical professions and having maintained one’s professional activity. The impact of such a surge in work-related stress may inflict a second blow to already fragile healthcare systems. Adequately monitoring work-related stress and its effects on healthcare workers may be crucial to plan for post-pandemic adjustments. The finding that burnout and poor wellbeing are both associated with poorer patient safety has significant implications for policymakers and management teams within healthcare settings (Hall et al., 2016).

NURS 6053 Developing Organizational Policies and Practices

Reference

Bangasser DA, Eck SR, Ordoñes Sanchez E. Sex differences in stress reactivity in arousal and attention systems. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44: 129–139. pmid:30022063

Broche-Pérez Y, Fernández-Fleites Z, Jiménez-Puig E, Fernández-Castillo E, Rodríguez-Martin BC. Gender and Fear of COVID-19 in a Cuban Population Sample. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2020; 1–9. pmid:32837428

Dutheil F, Duclos M, Naughton G, Dewavrin S, Cornet T, Huguet P, et al. WittyFit—Live Your Work Differently: Study Protocol for a Workplace-Delivered Health Promotion. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6: e58. pmid:28408363

Dutheil F, Pereira B, Moustafa F, Naughton G, Lesage F-X, Lambert C. At-risk and intervention thresholds of occupational stress using a visual analogue scale. PLoS One. 2017;12: e0178948. pmid:28586383

Lesage F-X, Berjot S, Deschamps F. Clinical stress assessment using a visual analogue scale. Occup Med. 2012;62: 600–605. pmid:22965867

Lesage FX, Berjot S. Validity of occupational stress assessment using a visual analogue scale. Occup Med Oxf Engl. 2011;61: 434–436. pmid:21505089

National Library of Medicine https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8882221/

Notman MT, Nadelson CC. Medicine: A Career Conflict for Women. Am J Psychiatry. 1973;130: 1123–1127. pmid:472890

Rossi R, Socci V, Talevi D, Mensi S, Niolu C, Pacitti F, et al. COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures impact on mental health among the general population in Italy. An N = 18147 web-based survey. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology; 2020 Apr.

Sandanger I, Nygård JF, Sørensen T, Moum T. Is women’s mental health more susceptible than men’s to the influence of surrounding stress? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004;39: 177–184. pmid:14999449

Schwartz, S. P., Adair, K. C., Bae, J., Rehder, K.J., Shanafelt, T.D., Profit, J., & Sexton, J.B 2018. Work-Life balance behaviors cluster in work settings and relate to burnout and safety culture: Across-sectional survey analysis BMJ Quality & Safety, 28 (2), 142-150. Doing: 10.1136/bmjqs 2018-007933

The National’s Health https://www.thenationshealth.org/content/48/8/1.3

Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, et al. Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17: 1729. pmid:32155789

Competing Needs

The increasing number of patients in the healthcare institution requires an additional
human resource. However, conventionally, the ratio of healthcare providers to the patients have
remained low because of the limited resources. Healthcare providers are forced to attend to many
patients beyond the standard requirements. Alternatively, the healthcare institution may opt to
recruit more staff and this will result in additional costs which may be transferred to what
patients pay. Some leaders may opt of make full of their current staffing in responding to the
rising costs and change in the payment policies by the federal government.
The introduction of the pay-for-value compensation method meant that healthcare
institutions would improve the quality of healthcare services to the patients (Kominski et al.,

NURS 6053 Developing Organizational Policies and Practices

2017).

https://www.google.com/

Besides, the policy aimed at eliminating all the unnecessary health interventions that
could otherwise increase the cost of medication. Furthermore, the hospital institutions are forced
to utilize their existing staff accordingly to improve both the quality of care and minimize the
treatment costs. according to NURS 6053 Developing Organizational Policies and Practices, nurses and other healthcare providers may be forced to work for long hours
since they have to spend lots of time understanding the need of their patients to meet the quality
threshold (Bernstrøm et al., 2019). On the other hand, the increasing number of patients also
force them to work overtime. Therefore, the need to lower the cost of medication and at the same
time maintain the quality exists.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERSNURS 6053 Developing Organizational Policies and Practices:

Assignment: Developing Organizational Policies and Practices
Competing needs arise within any organization as employees seek to meet their targets and
leaders seek to meet company goals. As a leader, successful management of these goals requires
establishing priorities and allocating resources accordingly.
Within a healthcare setting, the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients are often in
conflict. Mandatory overtime, implementation of staffing ratios, use of unlicensed assisting
personnel, and employer reductions of education benefits are examples of practices that might
lead to conflicting needs in practice.
Leaders can contribute to both the problem and the solution through policies, action, and
inaction. In this Assignment, you will further develop the white paper you began work on in
Module 1 by addressing competing needs within your organization.
To Prepare:
 Review the national healthcare issue/stressor you examined in your Assignment for
Module 1, and review the analysis of the healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
 Identify and review two evidence-based scholarly resources that focus on proposed
policies/practices to apply to your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
 Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post
regarding competing needs.
The Assignment (4-5 pages):
Developing Organizational Policies and Practices

Add a section to the paper you submitted in Module 1. The new section should address the
following:
 Identify and describe at least two competing needs impacting your selected healthcare
issue/stressor.
 Describe a relevant policy or practice in your organization that may influence your
selected healthcare issue/stressor.
 Critique the policy for ethical considerations, and explain the policy’s strengths and
challenges in promoting ethics.
 Recommend one or more policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing
needs of resources, workers, and patients, while addressing any ethical shortcomings of
the existing policies. Be specific and provide examples.
 Cite evidence that informs the healthcare issue/stressor and/or the policies, and provide
two scholarly resources in support of your policy or practice recommendations.
 Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 7 days to
provide you with quality feedback.
By Day 7 of Week 3
Submit your revised paper.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
 Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn+last name+first
initial.(extension)” as the name.
 Click the Week 3 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the
Assignment.
 Click the Week 3 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading
criteria from this area.
 Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the
document you saved as “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
 If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit
my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
 Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
 Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 7 days to
provide you with quality feedback
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:
Week 3 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment Draft for Authenticity:
Submit your Week 3 Assignment draft and review the originality report

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 3

To participate in this Assignment:
Week 3 Assignment

Next Module

To go to the next module:
Module 3
Module 2: Professionalism (Week 3)
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Moral Leadership [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
 Analyze the impact of competing needs of workforce, resources, and patients on policy
development
 Analyze the impact of competing needs on healthcare issues/stressors
 Analyze policies and practices for healthcare issues/stressors
 Critique organizational policies and practices for ethical considerations
 Recommend policy or practice changes to balance competing needs and ethical
considerations

Due By Assignment
Week 3, Days 1–2 Read the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 3, Day 3 Post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose your Assignment.

Week 3, Days 4-5

Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 3, Day 6 Post two peer Discussion responses.
Week 3, Day 7 Deadline to submit your assignment.
Photo Credit: on_WAL_CBLE0001_er1_EN.mov – Freeze frame

Learning Resources
Required Readings

American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements.
Silver Spring, MD: Author. Retrieved from
https://www.nursingworld.org/coe-view-only
Note: Review all, with special attention to “Provision 6” (pp. 23–26).

Kelly, P., & Porr, C. (2018). Ethical nursing care versus cost containment: Considerations to
enhance RN practice. OJIN: Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23(1), Manuscript 6.
doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No01Man06. Retrieved from
http://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/Tabl
eofContents/Vol-23-2018/No1-Jan-2018/Ethical-Nursing-Cost-Containment.html

Milliken, A. (2018). Ethical awareness: What it is and why it matters. OJIN: Online Journal of
Issues in Nursing, 23(1), Manuscript 1. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No01Man01. Retrieved from
http://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/Tabl
eofContents/Vol-23-2018/No1-Jan-2018/Ethical-Awareness.html

Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2012). Ethical, Moral, and Legal Leadership [Video file].
Baltimore, MD: Author.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2009b). Working with Individuals [Video file]. Baltimore, MD:
Author.

Discussion: Org
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6053_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric
 Grid View
 List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Add a section to
the paper you
submitted in
Module 1. In 4–5
pages, address the
following:

· Identify and
describe at least
two competing
needs impacting
your selected
healthcare
issue/stressor.

Points Range: 23
(23%) – 25 (25%)
The response

accurately and
clearly identifies
at least two
competing needs
impacting the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.

Points Range: 20
(20%) – 22 (22%)
The response
identifies at least
two competing
needs impacting
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.

Points Range: 18
(18%) – 19 (19%)
The response
identifies at least
two competing
needs impacting
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected that is
vague or
inaccurate.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 17 (17%)
The response
describes at least
two competing
needs impacting
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected that is
vague and
inaccurate, or is
missing.

· Describe a
relevant policy or
practice in your
organization that
may influence
your selected
healthcare

Points Range: 27
(27%) – 30 (30%)
The response
accurately and
thoroughly
describes in detail
a relevant policy

Points Range: 24
(24%) – 26 (26%)
The response
accurately
describes a
relevant policy or
practice in an

Points Range: 21
(21%) – 23 (23%)
The response
describes a
relevant policy or
practice in an
organization that

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 20 (20%)
The response
describes a
relevant policy or
practice in an
organization that

issue/stressor.

· Critique the
policy for ethical
considerations
and explain the
policy's strengths
and challenges in
promoting ethics.

or practice in an
organization that
may influence the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.
The response
accurately and
thoroughly
critiques in detail
the policy for
ethical
considerations
and explains in
detail the policy's
strengths and
challenges in
promoting ethics.

organization that
may influence the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.
The response
accurately
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and explains the
policy's strengths
and challenges in
promoting ethics.

may influence the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected that is
vague or
inaccurate.
The response
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and explains the
policy's strengths
and challenges in
promoting ethics
that is vague or
inaccurate.

may influence the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected that is
vague and
inaccurate, or is
missing.
The response
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and explains the
policy's strengths
and challenges in
promoting ethics
that is vague and
inaccurate, or is
missing.

· Recommend
one or more
policy or practice
changes designed
to balance the
competing needs
of resources,
workers, and
patients while
addressing any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies. Be
specific and
provide examples.
· Cite evidence
that informs the
healthcare
issue/stressor
and/or the policies
and provide two
scholarly
resources in
support of your
policy or practice

Points Range: 27
(27%) – 30 (30%)
The response
provide one or
more accurate,
clear, and
thorough
recommendations
for policy or
practice changes
designed to
balance the
competing needs
of resources,
workers, and
patients while
addressing any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies.
Specific and
accurate examples
are provided.
Accurate and

Points Range: 24
(24%) – 26 (26%)
The response
provides one or
more
recommendations
for policy or
practice changes
designed to
balance the
competing needs
of resources,
workers, and
patients while
addressing any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies.
Specific examples
may be provided.
Evidence is cited
that informs the
healthcare
issue/stressor

Points Range: 21
(21%) – 23 (23%)
The response
provides one or
more
recommendations
for policy or
practice changes
designed to
balance the
competing needs
of resources,
workers, and
patients while
addressing any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies that is
vague or
inaccurate.
Examples may be
provided.
Vague or
inaccurate

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 20 (20%)
as stated in NURS 6053 Developing Organizational Policies and Practices, the response
provides one or
more
recommendations
for policy or
practice changes
designed to
balance the
competing needs
of resources,
workers, and
patients while
addressing any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies that is
vague and
inaccurate, or is
missing.
Examples are
missing.
Vague and

recommendations. detailed evidence
is cited that
informs the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected and a
specific synthesis
of at least two
outside scholarly
resources in full
support of the
policy or practice
recommendations
is provided. The
response
integrates at least
2 outside
resources and 2 or
3 course-specific
resources that
fully support the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.

selected and a
synthesis of at
least one outside
scholarly resource
that may support
the policy or
practice
recommendations
is provided. The
response
integrates at least
1 outside resource
and 2 or 3 course-
specific resources
that may support
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.

evidence is cited
from 2 or 3
resources that
informs the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected and may
support the policy
or practice
recommendations
provided.

inaccurate
evidence is cited
that informs the
healthcare
issue/stressor and
may include at
least 1 scholarly
resource that
vaguely and
inaccurately
supports the
policy practice
recommendations
is provided, or is
missing.

Written
Expression and
Formatting –
Paragraph
Development and
Organization:
Paragraphs make
clear points that
support well-
developed ideas,
flow logically, and
demonstrate
continuity of
ideas. Sentences
are carefully
focused—neither
long and
rambling nor
short and lacking
substance. A clear
and

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow,
continuity, and
clarity.
A clear and
comprehensive
purpose
statement,
introduction, and
conclusion is
provided which
delineates all
required criteria.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow,
continuity, and
clarity 80% of the
time.
Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of the
assignment is
stated, yet is brief
and not
descriptive.

Points Range: 3.5
(3.5%) – 3.5
(3.5%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow,
continuity, and
clarity 60%–79%
of the time.
Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of the
assignment is
vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow,
continuity, and
clarity < 60% of
the time.
No purpose
statement,
introduction, or
conclusion was
provided.

according to NURS 6053 Developing Organizational Policies and Practices, comprehensive
purpose statement
and introduction
is provided which
delineates all
required criteria.
Written
Expression and
Formatting –
English writing
standards:
Correct
grammar,
mechanics, and
proper
punctuation

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation with
no errors.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1
or 2) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.

Points Range: 3.5
(3.5%) – 3.5
(3.5%)
Contains several
(3 or 4) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥
5) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation errors
that interfere with
the reader’s
understanding.

Written
Expression and
Formatting – The
paper follows
correct APA
format for title
page, headings,
font,
spacing, margins,
indentations, page
numbers,
parenthetical/in-
text citations, and
reference list.

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA
format with no
errors.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1
or 2) APA format
errors.

Points Range: 3.5
(3.5%) – 3.5
(3.5%)
Contains several
(3 or 4) APA
format errors.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥
5) APA format
errors.

Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6053_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric