NURS 6050 The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making Walden DQ

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 6050 The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making Walden DQ

NURS 6050 The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making Walden DQ

Word cloud generators have become popular tools for meetings and team-building events.
Groups or teams are asked to use these applications to input words they feel best describe their
team or their role. A “word cloud” is generated by the application that makes prominent the
most-used terms, offering an image of the common thinking among participants of that role.
What types of words would you use to build a nursing word cloud? Empathetic, organized, hard-
working, or advocate would all certainly apply. Would you add policy-maker to your list? Do
you think it would be a very prominent component of the word cloud?
Nursing has become one of the largest professions in the world, and as such, nurses have the
potential to influence policy and politics on a global scale. When nurses influence the politics
that improve the delivery of healthcare, they are ultimately advocating for their patients. Hence,
policy-making has become an increasingly popular term among nurses as they recognize a moral
and professional obligation to be engaged in healthcare legislation.
To Prepare:
 Revisit the Congress.gov website provided in the Resources and consider the role of RNs
and APRNs in policy-making.
 Reflect on potential opportunities that may exist for RNs and APRNs to participate in the
policy-making process.
By Day 3 of Week 8
Post an explanation of at least two opportunities that exist for RNs and APRNs to actively
participate in policy-making. Explain some of the challenges that these opportunities may
present and describe how you might overcome these challenges. Finally, recommend two
strategies you might make to better advocate for or communicate the existence of these
opportunities to participate in policy-making. Be specific and provide examples.
By Day 6 of Week 8
Respond to at least two of your colleagues’* posts by suggesting additional opportunities or
recommendations for overcoming the challenges described by your colleagues.
*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:

Week 8 Discussion Rubric
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 8
To participate in this Discussion:
Week 8 Discussion
Module 4: Healthcare Program Design and Implementation
(Weeks 7-8)

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Design and Implementation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD:
Author.
Accessible player
Learning Objectives
Students will:
 Analyze health policies
 Analyze opportunities for RNs and APRNs to participate in policy-making
 Analyze strategies for overcoming challenges for participating in policy-making
 Recommend strategies to improve the advocacy and communication of policy-making
opportunities
 Analyze healthcare programs
 Analyze the role of the nurse in healthcare program design
 Analyze the role of the nurse as advocates for target populations of healthcare programs
 Analyze the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation
 Analyze healthcare teams necessary for implementing healthcare programs

Due By
Assignment
Week 7, Days 1–2
Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion 1 post.
Week 7, Day 3
Post your initial Discussion 1 post.
Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 7, Days 4-5
Review peer Discussion 1 posts.
Compose your peer Discussion 1 responses.

Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 7, Day 6
Post at least two peer Discussion 1 responses on two different days (and not the same day as the
initial post).
Week 7, Day 7
Wrap up Discussion 1.
Week 8, Days 1–2
Compose your initial Discussion 2 post.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 8, Day 3
Post your initial Discussion 2 post.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 8, Days 4-5
Review peer Discussion 2 post.Compose your peer Discussion 2 post.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 8, Day 6
Post at least two peer Discussion 2 responses on two different days (and not the same day as the
initial post).
Week 8, Day 7
Wrap up Discussion 2.
Deadline to submit your Assignment.

Learning Resources
Required Readings
Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.).
Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

 Chapter 5, “Public Policy Design” (pp. 87–95 only)
 Chapter 8, “The Impact of EHRs, Big Data, and Evidence-Informed Practice” (pp.
137–146)
 Chapter 9, “Interprofessional Practice” (pp. 152–160 only)
 Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp.
183–191 only)

American Nurses Association (ANA). (n.d.). Advocacy. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from
https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (n.d.). Step by step: Evaluating violence and
injury prevention policies: Brief 4: Evaluating policy implementation. Retrieved from

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 6050 The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy-Making Walden DQ

https://www.cdc.gov/injury/pdfs/policy/Brief%204-a.pdf
Congress.gov. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.congress.gov/

Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of
Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080. doi:10.5465/AMR.1996.9704071863
Sacristán, J., & Dilla, T. D. (2015). No big data without small data: Learning health care systems
begin and end with the individual patient. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21(6),
1014–1017.
Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street level bureaucracy, and the
importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547.
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Getting your Program Designed and Implemented
[Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Accessible player
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Health policy and politics [Video file]. Baltimore, MD:
Author.
Accessible player
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Name: NURS_6050_Module04_Week08_Discussion_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and
synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible
sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current
APA manual writing rules and style.
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of
knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to
current APA manual writing rules and style.
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors.
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
First Response
17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
Second Response
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
Participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6050_Module04_Week08_Discussion_Rubric

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.