NURS 6050 Professional Nursing and State-Level Regulations DQ

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 6050 Professional Nursing and State-Level Regulations DQ

NURS 6050 Professional Nursing and State-Level Regulations DQ

Boards of Nursing (BONs) exist in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, American Samoa,
Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands. Similar entities may also exist for
different regions. The mission of BONs is the protection of the public through the regulation of
nursing practice. BONs put into practice state/region regulations for nurses that, among other
things, lay out the requirements for licensure and define the scope of nursing practice in that
state/region.
It can be a valuable exercise to compare regulations among various state/regional boards of
nursing. Doing so can help share insights that could be useful should there be future changes in a
state/region. In addition, nurses may find the need to be licensed in multiple states or regions.
To Prepare:
 Review the Resources and reflect on the mission of state/regional boards of nursing as the
protection of the public through the regulation of nursing practice.
 Consider how key regulations may impact nursing practice.
 Review key regulations for nursing practice of your state’s/region’s board of nursing and
those of at least one other state/region and select at least two APRN regulations to focus
on for this Discussion..
By Day 3 of Week 5
Post a comparison of at least two APRN board of nursing regulations in your state/region with
those of at least one other state/region. Describe how they may differ. Be specific and provide
examples. Then, explain how the regulations you selected may apply to Advanced Practice
Registered Nurses (APRNs) who have legal authority to practice within the full scope of their
education and experience. Provide at least one example of how APRNs may adhere to the two
regulations you selected.
By Day 6 of Week 5
Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days and explain how the
regulatory environment and the regulations selected by your colleague differ from your
state/region. Be specific and provide examples.
*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:

Week 5 Discussion Rubric
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 5
To participate in this Discussion:
Week 5 Discussion
Module 3: Regulation (Weeks 5-6)

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Regulation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Accessible player
Learning Objectives
Students will:
 Compare state/regional board of nursing regulations
 Compare boards of nursing and professional nurse associations
 Analyze members of boards of nursing
 Analyze state regulations for healthcare
Due By
Assignment
Week 5, Days 1–2
Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 5, Day 3
Post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 5, Days 4-5
Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 5, Day 6
Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the
initial post).
Week 5, Day 7
Wrap up Discussion.
Week 6, Days 1-6
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 6, Day 7
Deadline to submit your Assignment.

Learning Resources
Required Readings
Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.).
Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

 Chapter 4, “Government Response: Regulation” (pp. 57–84)

American Nurses Association. (n.d.). ANA enterprise. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from
http://www.nursingworld.org
Bosse, J., Simmonds, K., Hanson, C., Pulcini, J., Dunphy, L., Vanhook, P., & Poghosyan, L.
(2017). Position statement: Full practice authority for advanced practice registered nurses is
necessary to transform primary care. Nursing Outlook, 65(6), 761–765.
Halm, M. A. (2018). Evaluating the impact of EBP education: Development of a modified
Fresno test for acute care nursing. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 15(4), 272–280.
doi:10.1111/wvn.12291
National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN). (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018,
from https://www.ncsbn.org/index.htm
Neff, D. F., Yoon, S. H., Steiner, R. L., Bumbach, M. D., Everhart, D., & Harman J. S. (2018).
The impact of nurse practitioner regulations on population access to care. Nursing Outlook,
66(4), 379–385. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2018.03.001
Peterson, C., Adams, S. A., & DeMuro, P. R. (2015). mHealth: Don’t forget all the stakeholders
in the business case. Medicine 2.0, 4(2), e4.
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Regulatory Process [Video file]. Baltimore, MD:
Author.
Accessible player
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Healthcare economics and financing [Video file].
Baltimore, MD: Author.
Accessible player
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Quality improvement and safety [Video file]. Baltimore,
MD: Author.

Accessible player
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Name: NURS_6050_Module03_Week05_Discussion_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 6050 Professional Nursing and State-Level Regulations DQ

45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and
synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible
sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current
APA manual writing rules and style.
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of
knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to
current APA manual writing rules and style.
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors.
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
First Response
17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
Second Response
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
Participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6050_Module03_Week05_Discussion_Rubric

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.