NURS 6050 Presidential Agendas Focus Discussion

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 6050 Presidential Agendas Focus Discussion

NURS 6050 Presidential Agendas Focus Discussion

Rather than focus on the treatment of chronic disease, policies that influence population health
tend to emphasize prevention and wellness; the reduction or elimination of waste and the
eradication of health disparities based on race, ethnicity, language, income, gender, sexual

orientation, disability and other factors. The reasoning is that good health belongs to the whole,
not just an individual. (New York State Dept. of Health, n.d.)
Regardless of political affiliation, every citizen has a stake in healthcare policy decisions. Hence,
it is little wonder why healthcare items become such high-profile components of presidential
agendas. It is also little wonder why they become such hotly debated agenda items.
Consider a topic (mental health, HIV, opioid epidemic, pandemics, obesity, prescription drug
prices, or many others) that rises to the presidential level. How did the current and previous
presidents handle the problem? What would you do differently?
Reference:
New York State Department of Health. (n.d.). Making New York the healthiest state: Achieving
the triple aim. Retrieved June 21, 2021 from
https://www.health.ny.gov/events/population_health_summit/docs/what_is_population_health.pd
f
To Prepare:
 Review the Resources and reflect on the importance of agenda setting.
 Consider how federal agendas promote healthcare issues and how these healthcare issues
become agenda priorities.
By Day 3 of Week 1
Post your response to the discussion question: Consider a population health topic that rises to the
presidential agenda level. How did two recent presidents handle the problem? What would you
do differently?
By Day 6 of Week 1
Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by expanding on their
response and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging
their explanation and providing an example.
*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 1 Discussion Rubric
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1

To participate in this Discussion:Week 1 Discussion
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid
Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.
Identify the allocations of resources that the two presidents dedicated to this issue.
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response clearly and accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached
the issue, and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and
identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response is vague or partially inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential
administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the
issue.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response is missing or inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations
approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue.
Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis – Address the following:
Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the
healthcare issue you selected? Why is this agency most helpful?
How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay
there?
Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you
selected and justify your selection.
Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely to be
responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful.

– Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and
remains there.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 6050 Presidential Agendas Focus Discussion

– The response clearly and accurately identifies and justifies the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor
of the healthcare issue selected.
Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the
selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful.
– Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and
remains there.
– Identification and justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue is
included.
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare
issue is vague or inaccurate and justification is inaccurate or misaligned for why that agency is
most helpful.
– Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or
inaccurate.
– Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue
selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare
issue is missing.
– Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is inaccurate or
missing.
– Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue
selected is inaccurate or missing.
Part 3: Fact Sheet
Based on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-page
narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy-maker/legislator or a member of their
staff for this healthcare issue.
Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for
legislation.
Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues
Points Range: 28 (28%) – 30 (30%)
Creates an accurate and thorough fact sheet.

Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate synthesis of evidence on why this
healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.
Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.
Points Range: 24 (24%) – 27 (27%)
Creates an accurate fact sheet.
Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate summary of evidence on why this
healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.
Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.
Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
Creates a fact sheet that is partially accurate or incomplete.
Response provides an incomplete or inaccurate summary of evidence on why this healthcare
issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.
Response partially or inaccurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare
issues.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
Creates a fact sheet that is inaccurate or incomplete.
Response provides an inaccurate summary of evidence or evidence is missing on why this
healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.
Response justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and
incomplete or missing.
Resources
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Response includes 3 or more course resources and 2 or more outside sources.
Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response includes 2-3 course resources and 2 outside sources.
Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response includes fewer than 2 course resources and/or fewer than 2 outside resources.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response includes 2 or fewer resources.
Written Expression and Formatting: Paragraph

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate
continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and
lacking substance.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the
time.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of
the time.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the
time.
Written Expression and Formatting: English Writing Standards
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s
understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting:
The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, indentations,
parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.