NUR 590 The Dissemination of An Evidence-Based Practice Essay

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NUR 590 The Dissemination of An Evidence-Based Practice Essay

NUR 590 The Dissemination of An Evidence-Based Practice Essay

Assessment Description
The dissemination of an evidence-based practice project proposal is an important part of the final
project. Dissemination of your project to a local association or clinical site/practice informs important
stakeholders of evidence-based interventions that can improve clinical practice and ultimately patient
outcomes.
For this assignment, develop a professional presentation that could be disseminated to a professional
group of your peers.
Develop a 12-15 slide PowerPoint detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal. Create
speaker notes of 100-250 words for each slide. For the presentation of your PowerPoint, use Loom to
create a voice-over or a video. Refer to the topic Resources for additional guidance on recording your
presentation with Loom. Include an additional slide for the Loom link at the beginning and an additional
slide for References at the end. Be sure to consider your personal demeanor and tone during the
recorded presentation.
Include the following in your presentation:
1. Introduction (include PICOT statement)
2. Organizational Culture and Readiness
3. Problem Statement and Literature Review
4. Change Model, or Framework
5. Implementation Plan
6. Evaluation Plan
7. Conclusion
You are required to cite a minimum of six peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources
must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing
content.
Refer to the resource, "Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations," located in the Student Success
Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and
documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in
the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become
familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support
articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Resources

Collapse All
Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice
Read Chapters 22 and 23 in Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice.
View Resource

Innovations in Research Dissemination: Research Participants Sharing Stories at a Conference
Read "Innovations in Research Dissemination: Research Participants Sharing Stories at a Conference," by
Douglas, Jackson, Woods,
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/scholarly-
journals/innovations-research-dissemination-participants/docview/2327516899/se-2?accountid=7374

Loom
Loom is a free video recording tool that allows you send messages through shareable videos. For
assistance on installing the softwa
… Read More
https://support.gcu.edu/hc/en-us/articles/115015942807-Third-Party-Contact-Information

Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession
Review Chapter 20 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.
View Resource

Writing an Abstract for a Poster or Oral Presentation
Read "Writing an Abstract for a Poster or Oral Presentation," by Bodin and McDaniel, from Alabama
Nurse (2019).
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN
=136923973&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Engagement of Community Stakeholders to Develop a Framework to Guide Research Dissemination to
Communities

Read "Engagement of Community Stakeholders to Develop a Framework to Guide Research
Dissemination to Communities," by Cunningham-
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/scholarly-
journals/engagement-community-stakeholders-develop/docview/2443277489/se-2?accountid=7374

Poster Presentations: A Great Way to Share Your Evidence-Based Knowledge
Read "Poster Presentations: A Great Way to Share Your Evidence-Based Knowledge," by Sawaya,
from International Journal of Chi
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN
=123698144&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=ehost

Using Storylines for Bilingual Dissemination of a Grounded Theory
Read "Using Storylines for Bilingual Dissemination of a Grounded Theory," by Ligita, Francis, Wicking,
Harvey, and Nurjannah, fro
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/scholarly-
journals/using-storylines-bilingual-dissemination-grounded/docview/2327522196/se-2?accountid=7374

Avoid Common Mistakes When Presenting Your Research, Evidence-Based Practice, or Quality
Improvement Projects
Read "Avoid Common Mistakes When Presenting Your Research, Evidence-Based Practice, or Quality
Improvement Projects," by Siedleck
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation – Rubric
Collapse All
Introduction
6 points
Criteria Description
Introduction

5. 5: Excellent
6 points
The introduction is succinct, captures the attention of the audience, clearly identifies PICOT statement
and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main
talking points and for the presentation.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
The introduction is adequate. The PICOT statement and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based
practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation
are discussed.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
The introduction omits key aspects of the PICOT and fundamental aspects of the evidence-based
practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
The introduction generally presents the PICOT statement and most of the fundamental aspects of the
evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and for the presentation.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
An introduction is not included.
Organizational and Cultural Readiness
12 points
Criteria Description
Organizational and Cultural Readiness
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The organizational culture and readiness are thoroughly discussed and provide insight into the
organization challenges.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points

The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is incomplete.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The organizational culture and readiness are adequately discussed and provide the necessary insight
into the organization challenges.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is not included.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The organizational culture and readiness are generally discussed and provide insight into some of the
challenges faced by the organization.
Problem Statement and Literature Review
18 points
Criteria Description
Problem Statement and Literature Review
5. 5: Excellent
18 points
The problem describes the issue using evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize
and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide
adequate rationale and support throughout.
4. 4: Good
16.56 points
The problem statement summarizes the issue and uses evidence-based support from some of the
literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review provides
general support overall.
3. 3: Satisfactory
15.84 points
The problem statement is consistent throughout the presentation and concisely describes the issue
using strong evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem.
The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide excellent rationale and
support throughout.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
14.4 points
The problem statement outlines the issue. Support from the research from the literature review is
inconsistent.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The problem statement is not clearly stated. Research from the literature review is not included.
Change Model or Framework
12 points
Criteria Description
Change Model or Framework
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are thoroughly
described.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are adequately
described.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are generally
described.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The selected model or framework is and its application to the proposed implementation are only
partially described.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are not described.

Implementation Plan
12 points
Criteria Description
Implementation Plan
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The implementation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The implementation plan is generally described and provides an overall outline for the various aspects.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The implementation plan is adequately described and provides the details for the various aspects.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The implementation plan is not described.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The implementation plan is only partially described.
Evaluation Plan
12 points
Criteria Description
Evaluation Plan
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The evaluation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The evaluation plan is adequately described and provides key information for the various aspects.

3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The evaluation plan is outlined and provides general information for most aspects.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The evaluation plan is only partially described.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The evaluation plan is not described.
Conclusion
6 points
Criteria Description
Conclusion
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
The conclusion is short, clear and summarizes the key points of the presentation in a powerful and
memorable way.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
The conclusion summarizes the key points of the presentation in a concise manner.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
The conclusion outlines the broad aspects of the presentation.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
The conclusion mentions some aspects of the presentation, but there are some key aspects missing.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A conclusion is not presented.

Research
6 points
Criteria Description
Research
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues
stated in the assignment criteria.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
No outside sources were used to support the assignment.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.
Presentation
12 points
Criteria Description
Presentation PowerPoint, speaker notes, Loom voice over or video.
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The submission is presented effectively, and all of the required elements creatively contribute to the
presentation of the concepts.
4. 4: Good

11.04 points
The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting. Presentation contains a
majority of the required elements.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the required
elements.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented effectively, or is missing a
substantial amount of the required elements.
Aesthetic Quality
6 points
Criteria Description
Aesthetic Quality
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Design is cluttered. Materials detract from the content or the purpose of presentation is low quality.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, and graphs to amplify the message.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation.
Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals are evident.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points

Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from the presentation.
Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no
creativity or inventiveness is present.
Synthesis
6 points
Criteria Description
Synthesis
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Synthesis integrates ideas but does not adequately form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements at
times is confusing.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Synthesis is unique. Synthesis shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit
together. The combination of elements is verified.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Synthesis integrates ideas to form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements is logical and justified.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Synthesis integrates ideas inadequately. The combination of elements is not logical.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Synthesis does not successfully integrate ideas to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements
is not logical and/or verifiable.
Mechanics of Writing
6 points

Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of
effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct
and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice
(register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word
choice or sentence construction is employed.
Documentation of Sources
6 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style.
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format
is free of error.
4. 4: Good

5.52 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may
be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Sources are not documented.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with
numerous formatting errors.
Total 120 points

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.