NUR 590 Final Paper Detailing Your Evidence-Based Practice Essay

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NUR 590 Final Paper Detailing Your Evidence-Based Practice Essay

NUR 590 Final Paper Detailing Your Evidence-Based Practice Essay

Assessment Description
In 750-1,000 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice
project proposal. You will use the evaluation plan in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will
synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice
project proposal.
Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:
1. Discuss the expected outcomes for your evidence-based practice project proposal.
2. Review the various data collection tools associated with your selected research design and
select one data collection tool that would be effective for your research design. Explain how this
tool is valid, reliable, and applicable.
3. Select a statistical test for your project and explain why it is best suited for the tool you choose.
4. Describe what methods you will apply to your data collection tool and how the outcomes will be
measured and evaluated based on the tool you selected.
5. Propose strategies that will be taken if outcomes do not provide positive or expected results.
6. Describe the plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after
implementation.
Refer to the "Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview" document for an
overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.
You are required to cite a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources
must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing
content.
Complete the "APA Writing Checklist" to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting
criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at
the end of your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student
Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become
familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support
articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Resources
Collapse All
Evaluation of Bedside Shift Report: A Research and Evidence-Based Practice Initiative

Read "Evaluation of Bedside Shift Report: A Research and Evidence-Based Practice Initiative," by Schirm,
Banz, Swartz, and Richmo
… Read More
https://www-sciencedirect-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0897189717301118#s0030

Reliability and Validity: Linking Evidence to Practice
Read "Reliability and Validity: Linking Evidence to Practice," by Kamper, from Journal of Orthopaedic and
Sports Physical The
… Read More
https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.2519/jospt.2019.0702

Comparing Clinical Significance and Statistical Significance – Similarities and Differences
Read "Comparing Clinical Significance and Statistical Significance – Similarities and Differences," by Zbrog
(2021), located on t
… Read More
https://www.mhaonline.com/faq/clinical-vs-statistical-significance

Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession
Review Chapter 20 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.
View Resource

Research, Evidence-Based Practice, and Clinical Improvement/Innovation Posters
Read "Research, Evidence-Based Practice, and Clinical Improvement/Innovation Posters" (2015),
from AORN Journal.
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN
=109809571&site=eds-live&scope=site

A Practical Definition of Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing
Read "A Practical Definition of Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing," by Stannard, from Journal of
PeriAnesthesia Nursing
… Read More

https://www-sciencedirect-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S1089947219303181

Evidence-Based Practice Educational Intervention Studies: A Systematic Review of What Is Taught and
How It I s Measured
Read "Evidence-Based Practice Educational Intervention Studies: A Systematic Review of What is Taught
and How it is Measured," by
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/scholarly-
journals/evidence-based-practice-educational-intervention/docview/2089734479/se-2?accountid=7374

Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice
Read Chapter 4 and review Chapter 3 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to
Best Practice.
View Resource

Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice
Review Chapter 25 in Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice.
View Resource
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan – Rubric
Collapse All
Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal
14.4 points
Criteria Description
Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal
5. 5: Excellent
14.4 points
Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are discussed. Thorough
explanations and strong supporting research are provided.
4. 4: Good
13.25 points

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are discussed. Some detail is
needed for clarity or support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
12.67 points
Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are summarized. More information
is needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
11.52 points
Some expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are only partially outlined.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are not discussed.
Data Collection Tools
12 points
Criteria Description
Data Collection Tools
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
A data collection tool is selected and a well-supported explanation for why the tool is valid, reliable, and
applicable and would be effective for the research design is presented.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
A data collection tool is selected, and an explanation for why the tool would be effective for the
research design is presented. An explanation for the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable. Some detail is
needed for clarity or support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
A data collection tool is selected, and a summary for why the tool would be effective for the research
design is presented. A general explanation for the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable, but more
information and support are needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.6 points
A data collection tool is selected, but it is unclear why the tool would be effective for the research
design. A valid, reliable, and applicable explanation for the tool is incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A data collection tool is not discussed.
Statistical Test for Project
12 points
Criteria Description
Statistical Test for Project
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
A statistical test is selected, and a well-supported explanation for why the test is best suited for the tool
is clearly presented.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
A statistical test is selected, and an explanation for why the test is best suited for the tool is presented.
Some detail is needed for clarity or support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
A statistical test is selected, and a summary for why the test is best suited for the tool is presented.
More information or support is needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
A statistical test is selected, but it is unclear why the test is best suited for the tool.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A statistical test is omitted.
Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool
12 points

Criteria Description
Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
Methods that will be applied to the data collection are thoroughly discussed. A discussion of how the
outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected are presented.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
Methods that will be applied to the data collection are discussed. A discussion of how the outcomes will
be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or
support.
3. 3: Satisfactory

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NUR 590 Final Paper Detailing Your Evidence-Based Practice Essay

10.56 points
Methods that will be applied to the data collection are outlined. A summary of how the outcomes will
be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected is presented. More information or support is
needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
Methods that will be applied to the data collection tool partially discussed. It is unclear how the
outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Methods that will be applied to the data collection tool are not discussed.
Strategies for Outcomes That Are Nonpositive
14.4 points
Criteria Description
Strategies for Outcomes That Are Nonpositive
5. 5: Excellent
14.4 points
Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.
4. 4: Good

13.25 points
Clear and well-supported strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented.
3. 3: Satisfactory
12.67 points
General strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented. More information and support are needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
11.52 points
Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are not discussed.
Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution
13.2 points
Criteria Description
Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution
5. 5: Excellent
13.2 points
Detailed and well-supported plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after
implementation are presented.
4. 4: Good
12.14 points
Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are
presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
11.62 points
General plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are
presented. More information and support are needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
10.56 points

Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are
incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are not
discussed.
Required Sources
6 points
Criteria Description
Required Sources
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria
and nursing content.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the
assignment criteria and nursing content.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Number of required sources is only partially met.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not included.
Thesis Development and Purpose
8.4 points
Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of
the paper clear.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the
arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
9.6 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. 5: Excellent
9.6 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.
All sources are authoritative.
4. 4: Good
8.83 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth
progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. 3: Satisfactory
8.45 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of
claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible.
Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.68 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim
made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in
the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
6 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of
effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct
and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice
(register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word
choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
6 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is
apparent.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
All format elements are correct.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
6 points
Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format
is free of error.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with
numerous formatting errors.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may
be present.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.