NUR 550 Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table Essay

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NUR 550 Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table Essay

NUR 550 Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table Essay
Description:
The purpose of this assignment is to provide research evidence in support of the PICOT you
developed for your selected topic.
Conduct a search for 10 peer-reviewed, translational research articles published within the last 5
years that demonstrate support for your PICOT. You may include previous research articles from
assignments completed in this course. Use the "Literature Evaluation Table" provided to evaluate
the articles and explain how the research supports your PICOT.
Once your instructor returns this assignment, review the feedback and make any revisions
necessary. If you are directed by your instructor to select different articles in order to meet the
assignment criteria or to better support your PICOT, make these changes accordingly. You will
use the literature evaluated in this assignment for all subsequent assignments you develop as part
of your evidence-based practice project proposal in this course and in NUR-590, during which
you will synthesize all of the sections into a final written paper detailing your evidence-based
practice project proposal.
Refer to the "Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview" document for
an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is
expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines,
which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to
become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Topic 5 DQ 1
Description:
Identify either a safety or quality improvement initiative related to improving population health.
Explain how translational research can influence the development of the initiative. Include a
specific example to support your response.
Topic 5 DQ 2
Description:
Identify a quality initiative from your workplace. What were some barriers to implementation?
What are common barriers for translating research into practice?

Topic 5: Translating Evidence into Practice to Improve Safety and Quality and Eliminate
Barriers
Description
Objectives:

1. Explain how translational research can be used for safety and quality improvement initiatives
related to improving population health.
2. Discuss common barriers for translating research into practice.
Study Materials

Read Chapter 8 in Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness.
Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare
Description:
Read Chapters 4 and 9 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare.
Translating Evidence into Practice: How Advanced Practice RNs Can Guide Nurses in
Challenging Established Practice to Arrive at Best Practice
Description:
Read "Translating Evidence into Practice: How Advanced Practice RNs Can Guide Nurses in
Challenging Established Practice to Arrive at Best Practice," by Fenci and Matthews, from
AORN Journal(2017).
Eliminating Cardiovascular Health Disparities: There has Been Progress, but There is More to
Do!
Description:
Read "Eliminating Cardiovascular Health Disparities: There has Been Progress, but There is
More to Do!" by Coke, from The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing (2018).
Quality Improvement in Athletic Health Care
Description:
Read "Quality Improvement in Athletic Health Care," by Sauers, Sauers, and Valier, from
Journal of Athletic Training
(2017).

Lost in Translation: The Promise and Problems of the Globalization of Research
Description:
Read "Lost in Translation: The Promise and Problems of the Globalization of Research," by
Baumann, from Nursing Science Quarterly (2019).
Decreasing Barriers to Research Utilization Among Labor and Delivery Nurses
Description:
Read "Decreasing Barriers to Research Utilization Among Labor and Delivery Nurses," by
Heelan-Fancher, Edmonds, and Jones, from Nursing Research (2019).
Differentiating Between Research and Quality Improvement
Description:
Read "Differentiating Between Research and Quality Improvement," by Gregory, from Journal
of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing (2015).

Tasks

Topic 5 Participation
Description:
NA
Topic 6: Quality Improvement Initiatives and Clinical Prevention Intervention

Description
Objectives:
1. Integrate appropriate information and communication technologies for a clinical preventative
intervention.
2. Evaluate clinical prevention interventions that promote health and wellness for populations.
Study Materials
Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness

Description:
Read Chapter 9 and review Chapter 1 in Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness.
Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare
Description:
Read Chapter 19 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare.
The Role of the Nurse in Quality Improvement and Patient Safety
Description:
Read "The Role of the Nurse in Quality Improvement and Patient Safety," by Hickey and
Giardina, from Journal of Neurological and Neurosurgical Nursing(2019).
Reviewing the Literature: Essential First Step in Research, Quality Improvement, and
Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice
Description:
Read "Reviewing the Literature: Essential First Step in Research, Quality Improvement, and
Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice," by Bernhofer, from Journal for Nurses in
Professional Development (2015).
Clinical Preventive Services
Description:
Read "Clinical Preventive Services," by Guerrero Ayres and Bradley, from Encyclopedia of
Nursing Research (2017).
Reviewing the Literature
Description:
Read "Reviewing the Literature," by Bryne, from Sage Research Methods' Project Planner
(2017).
How to Conduct a Literature Review
Description:
Read "How to Conduct a Literature Review," by Watts, from Podiatry Review (2020).
Preventative Care Benefits for Adults

Description:
Explore "Preventative Care Benefits for Adults," located on the Healthcare.gov website.
My Healthfinder
Description:
Explore "My Healthfinder," located on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
website.
Healthy People 2030
Description:
Explore "Healthy People 2030," located on the Healthy People 2030 website.
Health Communication and Health Information Technology
Description:
Read "Health Communication and Health Information Technology," located on the
HealthyPeople.gov website.
Using E-Health and Information Technology to Improve Health
Description:
Read, "Using E-Health and Information Technology to Improve Health," located on the World
Health Organization website.
Technology and the Future of Mental Health Treatment
Description:
Read "Technology and the Future of Mental Health Treatment," located on the Mental Health
Information page of the National Institute of Mental Health website.
Impacts of Information and Communication Technologies on Nursing Care: An Overview of
Systematic Reviews (Protocol)
Description:
Read "Impacts of Information and Communication Technologies on Nursing Care: An Overview
of Systematic Reviews (Protocol)," by Rouleau, Gagnon and Cote, from Systematic Reviews
(2015).

Tasks
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-550 NUR-550-O503 Evidence-Based Practice Project: Evaluation of Literature Table
150.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) Satisfactory
(88.00%) Good (92.00%) Excellent (100.00%)

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NUR 550 Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table Essay

Content 100.0%
PICOT 5.0% The PICOT is omitted. NA NA NA The PICOT is clearly and accurately presented.
Articles 10.0% Required number of sources are not included. Article citations and permalinks
are omitted. Number of required sources is only partially met. Article citations and permalinks
are presented. One or more links do not lead to the intended article. Number of required sources
is met, but some sources are outdated or inappropriate. Article citations and permalinks are
presented. Article citations are presented, but there are errors. Sources are current and generally
appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Article citations and permalinks are
presented. Article citations are presented, but there are minor errors. Sources are current and
highly appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Article citations and
permalinks are presented. Article citations are accurate. NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice
Project Evaluation of Literature Table
Research Question, Hypothesis, Purpose or Aim of Study 10.0% Research question, hypothesis,
purpose or aim of study for one or more articles is omitted. Research question, hypothesis,
purpose or aim of study for each article is presented, but key information is consistently omitted.
There are inaccuracies throughout. Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for
each article is presented. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor
inaccuracies. Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for each article is
adequately presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. A discussion on the research
question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study is thoroughly and accurately presented for each
article.
Study Design 10.0% The study design for one or more article is omitted. The study design for
each article is presented, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies
throughout. The study design is indicated for each article. Key aspects are missing for one or two
articles. There are minor inaccuracies. The study design is adequately presented for each article.
Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. A thorough and accurate discussion on the study
design for each article is presented.
Setting and Sample 10.0% The setting and sample are omitted for one or more of the articles.
The setting and sample are indicated for each article, but key information is consistently omitted.
There are inaccuracies throughout. The setting and sample are indicated for each article. Key
aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies. The setting and sample
are adequately presented for each article. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. The

setting and sample in which the researcher conducted the study are detailed and accurate for each
article. NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table
Methods 10.0% Method of study for one or more articles is omitted. Overall, the methods of
study are incomplete. The method of study is presented for each article, but key information is
consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout. The method of study for each article is
presented. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies An
adequate discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. Minor detail is needed
for accuracy or clarity. A thorough and accurate discussion on the method of study for each
article is presented.
Analysis and Data Collection 10.0% Analysis and data collection for one or more articles is
omitted. Overall, the analysis and data collection are incomplete. Analysis and data collection are
presented for each article, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies
throughout. Analysis and data collection for each article are presented. Key aspects are missing
for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies. An adequate discussion on the method of
study for each article is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. A thorough and
accurate discussion on the analysis and data collection for each article is presented.
Outcomes and Key Findings 10.0% Outcomes and key findings for one or more articles are
omitted. Overall, the outcomes and key findings are incomplete. Outcomes and key findings are
presented for each article, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies
throughout. Outcomes and key findings for each article are presented. Key aspects are missing
for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies. An adequate discussion on outcomes and
key findings for each article are presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. A
thorough and accurate discussion on the outcomes and key findings collection for each article are
presented.
Recommendations 10.0% Researcher recommendations are omitted for one or more of the
articles. The recommendations described for three or more articles are inaccurate or incomplete.
Researcher recommendations are indicated for each article. The researcher recommendations
described for two of the articles are inaccurate or incomplete. Researcher recommendations for
each article are presented. Researcher recommendations described for one article are inaccurate
or incomplete. Researcher recommendations for each article are accurately presented. Minor
detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. Researcher recommendations are accurately and
thoroughly described for each article. NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of
Literature Table
NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table Explanation of How
Articles Support Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal 10.0% An explanation of
how the article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is omitted for one
or more of the articles. The explanation for three or more articles is inaccurate or incomplete. An
explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal
is presented. The explanation for two of the articles is inaccurate or incomplete. A general
explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal
is presented. The explanation for one article is inaccurate or incomplete. Support for the

evidence-based project proposal is generally evident. An explanation for how each article
supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. Minor detail is
needed for accuracy or clarity. Adequate support for the evidence-based project proposal is
demonstrated. A detailed explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based
practice project proposal is presented. Support for the evidence-based project proposal is clearly
evident.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Surface
errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word
choice or sentence construction is employed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract
the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence
structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate
language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be
present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The
writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.