NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper Essay

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper Essay

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper Essay

Description:
Refer to the PICOT you developed for your evidence-based practice project proposal. If your
PICOT required revision, include those revisions in this assignment. You will use your PICOT
paper for all subsequent assignments you develop as part of your evidence-based practice project
proposal in this course and in NUR-590, during which you will synthesize all of the sections into
a final written paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.
Write a 750-1,000-word paper that describes your PICOT.
1. Describe the population's demographics and health concerns.
2. Describe the proposed evidence-based intervention and explain how your proposed
intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the
population of focus.
3. Compare your intervention to previous practice or research.
4. Explain what the expected outcome is for the intervention.
5. Describe the time for implementing the intervention and evaluating the outcome.
6. Explain how nursing science, social determinants of health, and epidemiologic, genomic, and
genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected
population.
7. Create an Appendix for your paper and attach the PICOT. Be sure to review feedback from
your previous submission and revise your PICOT accordingly.
8. Complete the "APA Writing Checklist" to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and
formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist
as the final appendix at the end of your paper.
Refer to the "Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview" document for
an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.
You are required to cite at least four to six peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment.
Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and
nursing content.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the
Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to
become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical
support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:
BA-MSN; MSN-Nursing Education; MSN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner-Adult-Gerontology;
MSN Family Nurse Practitioner; MSN-Health Informatics; MSN-Health Care Quality and
Patient Safety; MSN-Leadership in Health Care Systems; MSN-Public Health Nursing
MS Nursing: Public Health MS Nursing: Education
MS Nursing: Acute Care Nurse Practitioner MS Nursing: Family Nurse Practitioner
MS Nursing: Health Care Quality and Patient Safety
4.1: Synthesize nursing science, determinants of health, and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic
data in the management of population health.
Topic 4 DQ 1
Description:
Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design. Using a translational research
article from your graphic organizer, analyze the methods and results sections to discuss
reliability and validity as it relates to the translational research. Include the permalink to the
article in your reference.
Topic 4 DQ 2
Description:
Identify a data collection tool you could use for your research. Consider how you could employ
translational research to potentially overcome barriers, which may arise during data collection.
Identify the best type of translational research to address this barrier and provide rationale for the
type you have chosen. What strategies would you employ to provide an understanding of your
chosen type of translational research and to gather collaborative support?
Topic 4 Participation
Topic 4: Critical Appraisal of Research

Description
Objectives:
1. Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design.
2. Analyze the reliability and validity of methods and results in a translational research article.
3. Describe strategies to maintain the integrity of translational research.
4. Discuss challenges of research design and data collections.
Study Materials

Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness
Description:
Read Chapters 1 and 6 in Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness.
Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare
Description:
Read Chapters 5 and 6 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare.
Work as an Inclusive Part of Population Health Inequities Research and Prevention
Description:
Read "Work as an Inclusive Part of Population Health Inequities Research and Prevention," by
Ahonen et al., from American Journal of Public Health(2018).
Aligning Evidence-Based Practice With Translational Research: Opportunities for Clinical
Practice Research
Description:
Read "Aligning Evidence-Based Practice With Translational Research: Opportunities for
Clinical Practice Research," by Weiss et al., from JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration
(2018).
Environmental Health Sciences in a Translational Research Framework: More than Benches and
Bedsides
Description:
Read "Environmental Health Sciences in a Translational Research Framework: More than
Benches and Bedsides," by Kaufman and Curl, from Environmental Health Perspectives (2019).
Scoping Implementation Science for the Beginner: Locating Yourself on the "Subway Line" of
Translational Research
Description:
Read "Scoping Implementation Science for the Beginner: Locating Yourself on the 'Subway
Line' of Translational Research," by Lane-Fall, Curran, and Beidas, from BMC Medical
Research Methodology (2019).
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-550 NUR-550-O503 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper 150.0

Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) Satisfactory
(88.00%) Good (92.00%) Excellent (100.00%)
Content 70.0%
Population Demographics and Health Concerns 5.0% The demographics and health concerns for
the population are not described. The demographics and health concerns for the population are
incorrect or only partially described. The demographics and health concerns for the population
are summarized. More information and supporting evidence are needed. The demographics and
health concerns for the population are described using sufficient evidence. The demographics
and health concerns for the population are accurate and thoroughly described using substantial
evidence.
Proposed Evidence-Based Intervention 13.0% The proposed evidence-based intervention is
omitted. The proposed evidence-based intervention is incomplete. It is unclear how the proposed
intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the
population of focus. The proposed evidence-based intervention is outlined. Explanation of how
the proposed intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity
for the population of focus is general. Some aspects are unclear. More information is needed.
The proposed evidence-based intervention is described. Explanation of how the proposed
intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the
population of focus is adequate. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy. The proposed
evidence-based intervention is well-developed and clearly described. Explanation of how the
proposed intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for
the population of focus is thorough.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper Essay

Comparison of Intervention to Current Research 12.0% Comparison of intervention to previous
practice or research is omitted. Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is
incomplete. Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is generally presented.
Some areas are vague. Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is adequately
presented. Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is thorough and clearly
presented.
Expected Outcome for Intervention 10.0% The expected outcome is for the intervention is
omitted. The expected outcome is for the intervention is incomplete. The expected outcome is for
the intervention is summarized. More information and supporting evidence is needed. The
expected outcome for the intervention is explained using sufficient evidence. The expected
outcome for the intervention is thoroughly explained using substantial evidence.
Time Estimated for Implementing Intervention and Evaluating Outcome 10.0% A description of
the timeline is not included. A description of the timeline is incomplete or incorrect. A
description of the timeline is included but lacks evidence. A description of the timelines is
complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence. A description of the timeline is extremely
thorough with substantial evidence.
Support for Population Health Management for Selected Population (C 4.1) 10.0% Explanation
of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic
data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected

population is omitted. Explanation of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and
epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health
management for the selected population is incomplete. There are major inaccuracies.
Explanation of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic,
and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the
selected population is summarized. More information and support are needed. Explanation of
how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic
data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected
population is adequate. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. Explanation of how nursing
science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied
or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population is thorough.
The narrative is insightful and demonstrates an understanding of how the various aspects
contribute to population health management for selected populations.
Appendix 5.0% The appendix and required resources are omitted. The APA Writing Checklist
and PICOT are attached, but an appendix has not been created. The paper does not reflect the use
of the APA Writing Checklist during development. The APA Writing Checklist and PICOT are
attached in the appendix. The APA Writing Checklist was generally used in development of the
paper, but some aspects are inconsistent with the paper format or quality. The APA Writing
Checklist and PICOT are attached in the appendix. It is apparent that the APA Writing Checklist
was used in development of the paper. The APA Writing Checklist and PICOT are attached in
the appendix. It is clearly evident by the quality of the paper that the APA Writing Checklist was
used in development. Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper NUR 550
Required Sources 5.0% Sources are not included. Number of required sources is only partially
met. Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. Number of
required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the
assignment criteria and nursing content. Number of required resources is met. Sources are
current and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and
appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is
descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is
comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the
paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion.
The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible
sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are
obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but
may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims.
Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible.
Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions.
Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from

introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that
presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface
errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word
choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence
structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate
language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be
present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is
clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used
appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some
elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used,
and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used;
There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.  Benchmark –
Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper NUR 550
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is
inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting
errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some
formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.