Discussion: Using the Walden Library NURS 6003

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

Discussion: Using the Walden Library NURS 6003

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT:    Discussion: Using the Walden Library NURS 6003

Discussion: Using the Walden Library NURS 6003

https://nursingpaperacers.com/discussion-using-the-walden-library-nurs-6003-2/

RE: Discussion – Week 4 Initial Post

The peer-review article I found is “Telemedicine, the current COVID-19 pandemic, and the future: a narrative review and perspectives moving forward in the USA.” In the world we live in, technology continues to advance by the day. As a future nurse practitioner, telemedicine has always drawn my attention because I always wondered how it worked and whether or not it is effective. According to my research, telemedicine is relatively new, finding my article was challenging. The first resource I used to find information on telehealth was the database in Walden University’s library because it contains many databases (n.d.). Unfortunately, I was not successful in the University’s library database and looked elsewhere. I found the article in the U.S. National Library of Medicine database. In order to determine if the article was reliable, I referenced Walden University’s library Evaluating Resources to learn more about reliable journals and articles (n.d.). Telemedicine provides luxury to people by being able to seek medical treatment from the convenience of their homes. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the outlook of telemedicine tremendously because the country was on lockdown, and medical offices were closed (Kichlo et al.,2020). I highly recommend this database to my colleagues because it contains many medical-related articles that can be used for further papers in the future. The database provides reliable sources and also helps with proper citation.

Resources

Kichloo, A., Albosta, M., Dettloff, K., Wani, F., El-Amir, Z., Singh, J., Aljadah, M., Chakinala, R. C., Kanugula, A. K., Solanki, S., & Chugh, S. (2020). Telemedicine, the current COVID-19 pandemic and the future: a narrative review and perspectives moving forward in the USA. Family medicine and community health8(3), e000530. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7437610/pdf/fmch-2020-000530.pdf.

Walden University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z: Nursing, Retrieved September 19, 2021 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981

Walden University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals, Retrieved September 19, 2021 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals

To Prepare:

Review the information presented in the Resources for using the Walden Library, searching the databases, and evaluating online resources.
Begin searching for a peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you.
By Day 3

Post the following:
Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Explain any difficulties you experienced while searching for this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not. Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not

Discussion: Using the Walden Library NURS 6003

Support main post with 3 of more current, credible sources and cite source within content of posting and on a reference list in proper APA.

Where can you find evidence to inform your thoughts and scholarly writing? Throughout your degree program, you will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights. As you search the research literature, it is important to use resources that are peer-reviewed and from scholarly journals. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have found useful in the past. For this Discussion, you explore databases available through the Walden Library.

By Day 6

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days, by offering suggestions/strategies for working with this database from your own experience, or offering ideas for use of alternative resources.

Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT:   Discussion: Using the Walden Library NURS 6003
Be sure to offer support from at least 2 current, credible sources in each required response to classmates’ main post and cite per APA.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 4 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 4 Discussion

Stephanie,

I enjoyed reading your post regarding telemedicine. I find the response of the private healthcare to the health needs of the public during a time of pandemic to be innovative. I also found finding reliable information about telemedicine to be challenging at the Walden University, most likely in the setting of such a new advancement in medicine. However, I did find an article highlighting the importance of physical assessment in avoiding delayed diagnoses. Yeshayahu cited fear of leaving home and rapid implementation of telemedicine during the pandemic for increased severity of illnesses of pediatric patients who delayed seeking care (Yeshayahu, 2021). Benitz noted that the Army saw increase in the utilization of healthcare services by 50% during the height of the pandemic and the soldiers and their families benefitted from the ability to access a healthcare provider from the privacy of their own homes (Benitz, 2021).

In the event I had further difficulty finding information within the library, I would consider turning to other resources like Google Scholar, ask a Librarian at Walden University, or even a simple google search to prompt the generation of ideas. I also can utilize the library at the hospital I’m employed at and reference the online data bases the hospital subscribes to. Thank you for your recommendation of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, I didn’t know it existed.

Best,

Arrick

References

Benitz, J. (2021). Here to Stay: COVID Response Reveals Telehealth Benefits. Army Magazine, 71(8), 32–35.

Yeshayahu, Y. (2021). Delayed Presentation of Children to Healthcare Facilities due to COVID-19 Lockdown, Leading to Severe Complications. Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal, 12(2), 1–3.

NURS_6003_Module04_Week06_Discussion_Rubric

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources. 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. 

Supported by at least three credible sources. 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s). 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 

Post is cited with two credible sources. 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 

Contains only one or no credible sources. 

Not written clearly or concisely. 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
First Response
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. 

Responses to faculty questions are missing. 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. 

Responses to faculty questions are missing. 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.