Discussion: Big Data Risks and Rewards NURS 5051
Discussion: Big Data Risks and Rewards NURS 5051
Main Discussion.
Big Data
Big data are extremely large data sets that may be analyzed computationally to reveal patterns, trends, and associations, especially relating to human behavior and interactions. These large and complex data sets are voluminous and traditional data processing software often cannot manage them. Different types of data are used in healthcare, some of which are; electronic health records, clinical trial data, health surveys. Some of these the data obtained in healthcare settings fall under the big data category. Data can also be obtained from medical monitory devices like the electrocardiogram and life support machines. Healthcare data are usually voluminous since they are continuous data and are challenging to manage.
The potential benefits of using big data in healthcare is the ability of clinicians to have a huge archive of patient’s records in the electronic health records system to enable them to retrieve information about past and present medical history about patient diagnosis, laboratory results and general clinical data required to provide adequate medical care to patients. Big data also helps in reducing medication errors and is used in safety surveillance of drugs. Big data are used in increasing the efficacy of healthcare delivery, reduction of health cost and improving patient outcome. performing risk assessments for chronic diseases is more convenient with the collection of medical data through electronic health records (EHR). (Chen, M., Hao, Y., Hwang, K., & Wang, L., 2019).
Challenges of Managing Big Data
There are various challenges in managing big data, but the most severe challenge is the security and privacy of the data. Healthcare data contains very sensitive information which makes it a prime target for identity hackers. When things of this nature happen, the information obtained can be used for blackmail and other types of fraud. This breach in confidentiality has far reaching consequences. The fear of litigation and breach of privacy discourages providers from sharing patient health data, even when they are de-identified (Adibuzzaman, M., DeLaurentis, P., Hill, J., & Benneyworth, B. D. 2018). Healthcare organizations are subjected to huge fines and disciplinary sanctions for any type of security breech in electronic health record systems. For example, a colleague of mine who lost her job a few years back because she logged into the health record of a family member and shared the information with another family member breeching confidentiality in the process.
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Discussion: Big Data Risks and Rewards NURS 5051
Another challenge is that some of these data do not fully capture temporal and process information. In these cases, clinical data captured remotely at various sites even within the same organization are not well integrated. For example, an EHR is primarily used for documenting patient care and was designed to facilitate insurance company billing, and pharmacy records were designed for inventory management, These systems were not developed to capture the temporal and process information which is indispensable for understanding disease progression, therapeutic effectiveness and patient outcomes. Therefore, they are not flexible in their use.
Mitigation of challenges or risks
One of the ways of mitigating the challenges of risk of big data is to install an effective cyber security software which protects the electronic health record system from hacking. It is important to implement strict data regulation and control mechanism in all healthcare organizations to prevent breech in security and protect patient privacy [Wang, Y., Kung, L & Byrd, T. A.,2018]
References
Adibuzzaman, M., DeLaurentis, P., Hill, J., & Benneyworth, B. D. (2018). Big data in healthcare – the promises, challenges and opportunities from a research perspective: A case study with a model database. AMIA … Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2017, 384–392.
Chen, M., Hao, Y., Hwang, K., & Wang, L., (2019). “Disease Prediction by Machine Learning Over Big Data from Healthcare Communities,” in IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 8869-8879, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2694446.
Wang, Y., Kung, L & Byrd, T. A., (2018). Big data analytics: understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations. Technological Forcasting & social change ,126, 3-13. doi; 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.019
When you wake in the morning, you may reach for your cell phone to reply to a few text or email messages that you missed overnight. On your drive to work, you may stop to refuel your car. Upon your arrival, you might swipe a key card at the door to gain entrance to the facility. And before finally reaching your workstation, you may stop by the cafeteria to purchase a coffee.
From the moment you wake, you are in fact a data-generation machine. Each use of your phone, every transaction you make using a debit or credit card, even your entrance to your place of work, creates data. It begs the question: How much data do you generate each day? Many studies have been conducted on this, and the numbers are staggering: Estimates suggest that nearly 1 million bytes of data are generated every second for every person on earth.
As the volume of data increases, information professionals have looked for ways to use big data—large, complex sets of data that require specialized approaches to use effectively. Big data has the potential for significant rewards—and significant risks—to healthcare. In this Discussion, you will consider these risks and rewards.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and reflect on the web article Big Data Means Big Potential, Challenges for Nurse Execs.
Reflect on your own experience with complex health information access and management and consider potential challenges and risks you may have experienced or observed.
By Day 3 of Week 5
Post a description of at least one potential benefit of using big data as part of a clinical system and explain why. Then, describe at least one potential challenge or risk of using big data as part of a clinical system and explain why. Propose at least one strategy you have experienced, observed, or researched that may effectively mitigate the challenges or risks of using big data you described. Be specific and provide examples.
By Day 6 of Week 5
Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, by offering one or more additional mitigation strategies or further insight into your colleagues’ assessment of big data opportunities and risks.
*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 5 Discussion Rubric
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 5
Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Discussion: Big Data Risks and Rewards NURS 5051
To participate in this Discussion:
Week 5 Discussion
Next Module
To go to the next module:
Module 4
Module 4: Technologies Supporting Applied Practice and Optimal Patient Outcomes (Weeks 6-8)
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Informatics Tools and Technologies [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Accessible player
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Evaluate healthcare technology trends for data and information in nursing practice and healthcare delivery
Analyze challenges and risks inherent in healthcare technology
Analyze healthcare technology benefits and risks for data safety, legislation, and patient care
Evaluate healthcare technology impact on patient outcomes, efficiencies, and data management
Analyze research on the application of clinical systems to improve outcomes and efficiencies
Due By
Assignment
Week 6, Days 1–2
Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 6, Day 3
Post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 6, Days 4-5
Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 6, Day 6
Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
Week 6, Day 7
Wrap up Discussion.
Week 7, Days 1-7
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 8, Days 1-6
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 8, Day 7
Deadline to submit your Assignment.
Learning Resources
Required Readings
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Chapter 14, “The Electronic Health Record and Clinical Informatics” (pp. 267–287)
Chapter 15, “Informatics Tools to Promote Patient Safety and Quality Outcomes” (pp. 293–317)
Chapter 16, “Patient Engagement and Connected Health” (pp. 323–338)
Chapter 17, “Using Informatics to Promote Community/Population Health” (pp. 341–355)
Chapter 18, “Telenursing and Remote Access Telehealth” (pp. 359–388)
Dykes, P. C., Rozenblum, R., Dalal, A., Massaro, A., Chang, F., Clements, M., Collins, S. …Bates, D. W. (2017). Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study. Critical Care Medicine, 45(8), e806–e813. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002449
HealthIT.gov. (2018c). What is an electronic health record (EHR)? Retrieved from
https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr
Rao-Gupta, S., Kruger, D. Leak, L. D., Tieman, L. A., & Manworren, R. C. B. (2018). Leveraging interactive patient care technology to Improve pain management engagement. Pain Management Nursing, 19(3), 212–221.
Skiba, D. (2017). Evaluation tools to appraise social media and mobile applications. Informatics, 4(3), 32–40.
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Public Health Informatics [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Accessible player
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Electronic Records and Managing IT Change [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Accessible player
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: NURS_5051_Module03_Week04_Discussion_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors.
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
First Response
17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
Second Response
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
Participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_5051_Module03_Week04_Discussion_Rubric