Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies NURS 5051

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies NURS 5051

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT:  Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies NURS 5051  

Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies NURS 5051

New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.

Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.

In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.

To Prepare:

Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”
Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed research articles from your research.
For information about annotated bibliographies, visit https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographies
The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)

In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:

Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.
Include an introduction explaining the purpose of the paper.
Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.
In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.
Use APA format and include a title page.
Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.
By Day 7 of Week 8

Submit your completed Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 8 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 8 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 8 Assignment Rubric

Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT:  Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies NURS 5051
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 8 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 8

To participate in this Assignment:

Week 8 Assignment

Next Module

To go to the next module:

Module 5

 

Module 5: The Nurse Leader and the System Development Life Cycle (Weeks 9-10)

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Systems Implementation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Accessible player

Learning Objectives

Students will:

Analyze how inclusion of the nurse in the purchasing of health information technology systems impacts healthcare organizations
Analyze the impact of nurse inclusion on each step of the systems development life cycle
Due By
Assignment
Week 9, Days 1–2
Read/Watch/Listen to the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 9, Day 3
Post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose your Assignment.
Week 9, Days 4-5
Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 9, Day 6
Post at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
Week 9, Day 7
Wrap up Discussion.
Week 10, Days 1-6
Continue to compose your Assignment.
Week 10, Day 7
Deadline to submit your Assignment.

Learning Resources

Required Readings

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Chapter 9, “Systems Development Life Cycle: Nursing Informatics and Organizational Decision Making” (pp. 175–187)
Chapter 12, “Electronic Security” (pp. 229–242)
Chapter 13, “Workflow and Beyond Meaningful Use” (pp. 245–261)

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.a). Health IT evaluation toolkit and evaluation measures quick reference guide. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from

https://healthit.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/evaluation-resources/health-it-evaluation-toolkit-and-evaluation-measures-quick-reference

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.b). Workflow assessment for health IT toolkit. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from https://healthit.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/evaluation-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit

Required Media

Louis, I. (2011, August 17). Systems development life cycle (SDLC) [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtpyjPrpyX8

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Interoperability, Standards, and Security [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Accessible player

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Managing Health Information Technology [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Accessible player

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

Grid View
List View

Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Be sure to address the following:

·   Properly identify 5 peer-reviewed articles selected.
·   Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.

Points Range: 77 (77%) – 85 (85%)
The responses accurately and clearly identify 5 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.

The responses accurately and thoroughly summarize in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described.

Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.

Points Range: 68 (68%) – 76 (76%)
The responses identify 5 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.

The responses summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described.

Accurate examples are provided which support the responses provided.

Points Range: 60 (60%) – 67 (67%)
The responses vaguely or inaccurately identify 5 or less peer-reviewed articles for the Assignment.

The responses summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described that is vague or inaccurate.

Examples provided to support the responses are vague or inaccurate.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 59 (59%)
The responses vaguely and inaccurately identify less than 5 peer-reviewed articles for the Assignment, or are missing.

The responses vaguely and inaccurately summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described, or are missing.

Examples provided to support the responses are vague and inaccurate, or are missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

Public Health Informatics

©2018 Laureate Education, Inc 1

Public Health Informatics Program Transcript

[MUSIC PLAYING]

RONNA GOTTHAINER: The health department uses a lot of different information technology. And among
the things we use is geographic information systems.

We use that to plot where our health issues are within the county, so that if we do a health survey
and we can take the data by zip code, determine where the hotspots are for health issues, and
address those health issues in the right places in the community.

MAURA ROSSMAN: Twenty years ago, the public health model was, we know that cardiovascular disease
is a problem, so we are going to educate everyone about salt intake. Well, maybe I don’t need to be
educated on salt intake, but there’s 10 people that really need intensive education and we’re
learning that that’s much more cost effective than sort of educating the 300,000 who it may not be
relevant to.

RONNA GOTTHAINER: We also use other information technology. For example, document management, which
ties everything together in one place so that you can access all your information, not in paper
with lots of file cabinets, but electronically. And electronic health records is another place
where we use information technology. Our health department is going to have all our clinical
services on one electronic health record system. So everything from the intake forms to the billing
and all the medical charts will happen within the electronic health record.

MAURA ROSSMAN: We’re currently undergoing our second Howard County health assessment survey.

NARRATOR: Is your organization focused on improving the health of Howard County residents? Then
there is a great free resource for you, the results of the Howard County Health Assessment Survey
can help you direct your resources to be as effective as possible. Using health data, you can
decide what is needed, and which members of the community to assist.

MAURA ROSSMAN: And from that statistical analysis, we created maps, and we’re able to tell in which
geographic zip codes, for instance, folks were having difficulty with accessing a primary care
provider. Zip codes where there were higher smoking rates than other zip codes. Zip codes where
folks were feeling more stressed than other zip codes, and then developing an intervention.

RONNA GOTTHAINER: We have used health informatics to look at health disparities in the community.
That’s by looking by zip code at where the people are less healthy, and what types of people use
the demographic information, to

 

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.