Assignment: Critically Ill Patients

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

Assignment: Critically Ill Patients

Assignment: Critically Ill Patients

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER:Assignment: Critically Ill Patients

suggest that a preponderance of patients/surrogates prefer to share responsibility for decision-making relatively equally with clinicians, many patients/surrogates prefer to exercise greater authority in decision-making, and many other patients/surrogates prefer to defer even highly value-laden choices to clinicians (10–13). Ethically justifiable models of decision-making include a broad range to accommodate such differences in needs and preferences.

In some cases, the patient/surrogate may wish to exercise significant authority in decision-making. In such cases, the clinician should understand the patient’s values, goals, and preferences to a sufficient degree to ensure the medical decisions are congruent with these values. The clinician then determines and presents the range of medically appropriate options, and the patient/surrogate chooses from among these options. In such a model, the patient/surrogate bears the majority of the responsibility and burden of decision-making. In cases in which the patient/surrogate demands interventions the clinician believes are potentially inappropriate, clinicians should follow the recommendations presented in the recently published multiorganization policy statement on this topic (14).

In other cases, the patient/surrogate may prefer that clinicians bear the primary burden in making even difficult, value-laden choices. Research suggests that nearly half of surrogates of critically ill patients prefer that physicians independently make some types of treatment decisions (10–13). Further, data suggest that approximately 5–20% of surrogates of ICU patients want clinicians to make highly value-laden choices, including decisions to limit or

1334 American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Volume 193 Number 12 | June 15 2016

EDITORIALS

withdraw life-prolonging interventions (12, 13). In such cases, using a clinician-directed decision-making model is ethically justifiable (15–24).

Employing a clinician-directed decision-making model requires great care. The clinician should ensure that the surrogate’s preference for such a model is not based on inadequate information, insufficient support from clinicians, or other remediable causes. Further, when the surrogate prefers to defer a specific decision to the clinician, the clinician should not assume that all subsequent decisions are also deferred. The surrogate should therefore understand what specific choice is at hand and should be given as much (or as little) information as the surrogate wishes. U

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.